MeetingMinutes20100203 < VerilogAMS

VerilogAMS Web>AmsAssertions>RequirementsGatheringGroup>MeetingMinutes20100203 (2010-02-03, ScottLittle) (raw view)EditAttach
Attendees:<br /><br />0000000000000001000010111100000000000000 Qamar Alam<br />1111111111111111111010111111101111110111 Himyanshu Anand<br />0111111110011111101110100011111111111110 Kenneth Bakalar<br />1111101010110110111011000011100011101010 Prabal Bhattacharya<br />0000000000000011000010100100001001000000 Sri Chandra<br />0111101111111111110110101111101111100011 Eduard Cerny<br />1110111000010110101110111110111111101010 Scott Cranston<br />0000000000000001000000000000000100000010 Dave Cronauer<br />0000000000001100000000011111100111101110 Dejan Nickovic<br />1101110111100100000000000000000000000000 Mike Demler<br />0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Surrendra Dudani<br />1110000000111111111111001101111111111111 John Havlicek<br />1110001100100000000000000000000000000000 Kevin Jones<br />0000000111111111101110111111111111111111 Jim Lear<br />0000000000001110111000000000000000000011 Top Lertpanyavit<br />1111110110111111111111111011111111111111 Scott Little<br />0000000000000100000000000000000000000000 Erik Seligman<br />1010000000000000000000000000000000000000 David Sharrit<br />0000000100000000000000000000000000000000 Murtaza<br />0000000100000000000101100110000001001000 Martin O'Leary<br /><br />Summary:<br />-Ken Bakalar hasn't sent out the slides. We will check with Ken on his progress. A backup plan was also discussed in the event that Ken doesn't have time to create the slides.<br />-Ideas for slide content were discussed briefly.<br /><br />Action Items: <br /><br /><br />Details:<br /><br />SL: It was my intention to discuss the slides provided by Ken at the meeting today. Ken has not called in or provided slides. I would like to say a bit about generally what is expected from the slides and then solicit input from John and Ed who have more experience with these meetings. I think that the features should be described with a motivating example or problem statement. I think that it is generally understood that the syntax presented would be preliminary and examples can be useful to illustrate your point.<br /><br />EC: I don't think that using example syntax is a good idea. Proposing syntax can be dangerous.<br /><br />JH: I disagree. I think that proposing syntax helps people envision a solution to the problem.<br /><br />HA: Should we form a backup plan in case Ken isn't able to do the slides.<br /><br />SL: Okay, it sounds like Jim has already started the process for the synchronization section. I think it makes sense to let him proceed. I can deal with the remaining two sections.<br /><br />HA: It might be a good idea to solicit help for those.<br /><br />SL: Does anyone want to volunteer to help with those slides?<br /><br />HA: I can help with the assertions.<br /><br />TL: What is the intended audience here?<br /><br />SL: This is to the P1800 or SystemVerilog committee. I would presume a very digital centric crowd. We need to clearly motivate the need and use cases for these items.<br /><br />HA: Who is going to present this material?<br /><br />SL: I don't know. We should decide that next week.<br /><br />JL: Is the Verilog-AMS committee going to present as well?<br /><br />SL: I believe they are planning to have something. They will have a meeting this afternoon regarding that issue.

-- Main.ScottLittle - 2010-02-03
Topic revision: r1 - 2010-02-03 - 23:22:34 - ScottLittle
VerilogAMS