(r2) RemoveDeprecated < P1076

P1076 Web>Vhdl2019CollectedRequirements>RemoveDeprecated (revision 2) (raw view)~~EditAttach~~

---+ Remove Deprecated Constructs

%TOC%
---++ Recommendation: Reject

---++ Proposal Information
   * Who Updates:
   * Date Last Updated
   * Priority:
   * Complexity:
   * Focus: Performance

---++ Requirement Summary & Rationale

[[http://www.eda.org/vhdl-200x/vhdl-200x-perf/proposals/perf06.txt"][Proposal here]]

---++ Arguments For

_Add your signature here to indicate your support for the proposal_

---++ Arguments Against

_Add your signature here to indicate your do not support for the proposal_

---++ General Comments

---+++ Email Reflector Comments

   * [[http://www.eda.org/vhdl-200x/vhdl-200x-perf/hm/][Original VHDL-200X Simulation Performance Reflector Archive]]

---++++ From: [[Main.PeterFlake][Peter Flake]] (Thu Jan 03 2013 - 09:48:21 PST)

Perf 6: Removal of constructs indicated in VHDL 2002

I would want to keep postponed processes.

---++++ From: [[Main.BrentHahoe][Brent Hayhoe]] (Mon Jan 21 2013 - 13:09:26 PST)

PERF-06 Removal of constructs indicated in VHDL-2002

I too would want to keep 'postponed' processes. The main problem is how do we check that no one is using any of the proposed constructs to be depreciated. The obvious candidates are port mode 'linkage' and guarded blocks, but how do we poll the user community?

---++++ From: [[Main.BrentHahoe][Brent Hayhoe]] (Mon Jan 21 2013 - 13:09:26 PST)

Re: PERF-06 Removal of constructs indicated in VHDL-2002

After jumping in with both feet, I have since learnt that the port mode 'linkage' is used extensively by the IEEE Std. 1149.1 BSDL - a subset of VHDL.

So we can't get rid of that one!

Topic revision: r1 - 2020-02-17 - 15:34:38 - TWikiGuest

P1076