RE: [sv-ac] levels argument proposal

Hi Faisal,

I think that proposal #670 is sufficiently clear (to the extent that the
description of $dumpvars is).
I vote to accept it.

ed
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of Faisal Haque (fhaque)
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 1:52 PM
> To: Surrendra.Dudani@synopsys.COM; sv-ac@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] levels argument proposal
> 
> If any one has objections to  proposal 241  please do so before 5 pm
> PDT, Monday  April 18th. 
> If no objections are issued by Monday then we will consider 
> 241 passed. 
> For 670 since we have not discussed it yet.  I will give 
> people time to
> discuss it today and would like to get an email vote on it.  
> I know there is a champions meeting on Tuesday. I would like 
> to have the
> vote on Monday unless there is a strong objection.
> 
> So unless there is an objection, I would like to get votes on proposal
> #670 by Monday at 5:00 pm PDT.
> Thanks
> -Faisal
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Surrendra Dudani
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:08 AM
> To: sv-ac@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] levels argument proposal
> 
>  
> Hi Manisha,
> I'm not an expert on dumpvars, perhaps Bassam would be able to answer
> this question. LRM for 1364 does not spell out this condition.
> Surrendra
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kulshrestha, Manisha [mailto:Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 11:51 AM
> To: Surrendra.Dudani@synopsys.COM; sv-ac@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] levels argument proposal
> 
> Surrendra,
> 
> Your proposal looks fine to me. I was just wondering if the arguments
> after the level are just an identifier, how does $dumpvars resolves it
> if there is a variable and a module with the same name in the design.
> 
> Thanks.
> Manisha 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Surrendra Dudani
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 6:01 PM
> To: sv-ac@eda.org
> Subject: [sv-ac] levels argument proposal
> 
> 
> I have created a mantis item #670 with a proposal regarding 
> the "levels"
> argument for assertion control system tasks as we discussed in today's
> meeting. Please review and provide feedback.
> Surrendra
> ****************************************
> Surrendra A. Dudani
> Synopsys, Inc.
> 377 Simarano Drive, Suite 300
> Marlboro, MA 01752
> 
> Tel:   508-263-8072
> Fax:   508-263-8123
> email: Surrendra.Dudani@synopsys.com
> **************************************** 
> 
> 
>