SV-BC Meeting Minutes for April 26, 2016

Attendee Company Mantis
Perms

Mar

15

Mar

29

Apr

12

Apr

26

Shalom Bresticker Accellera U X X   X
Daniel Schostak ARM U        
Steven Sharp Cadence U X X X X
Francoise Martinolle Cadence U X X X X
Mark Strickland Cisco U X X   X
Matt Maidment Intel M X X X X
Brandon Tipp Intel U X X X X
Boon Chong Ang Intel   X X    
Jonathan Bromley Oracle U   X   X
Neil Korpusik Oracle M X X X X
Gauraw Singh Chandel Mentor Graphics          
Eric Coffin Mentor Graphics R X X X  
Alex Gran Mentor Graphics U        
Sharad Jain Mentor Graphics          
C Venkat Ramana Rao Mentor Graphics R   X X  
Dave Rich Mentor Graphics U     X X
Ray Ryan Mentor Graphics     X X X
Gordon Vreugdenhil Mentor Graphics U        
Sachin Pathak Mentor Graphics     X    
Dave Scott Real Intent U X      
Mark Hartoog Synopsys U X X X X
Brad Pierce Synopsys U X X    
Arturo Salz Synopsys U X      
Justin Refice nVidia U X   X X
Karen Pieper Accellera M        
April 26, 2016 8am-10am PDT

Action Items

Open

Jan 19 Matt: Track version specific changes to LRM as AI and file if needed.

Jan 19 DaveR: Check with some of the original contributors about the intent of 315 for clarification of 3211.

Apr 12 Matt: update proposal for 2500 to remove text regarding closure of 4691.

Apr 12 Matt: Add 484 and 305 to next email Vote

Apr 26 Matt: Ask Neil about reflector archive status during the next meeting

Apr 26 Matt: Close 4691

Apr 26 Shalom: file Mantis item for missing entries in Table 6-7 and/or Table 7-1.

Apr 26 Matt add 343 to the next email ballot

Apr 26 Matt add 4528 to future email vote if 343 is approved

Apr 26 Matt update all Mantis items per April 25/26 voting results.

Apr 26 Jonathan to update 2831 for future vote

Agenda

  • Review IEEE Patent Policy

http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt

Drew attendees attention to the policy.

  • Approve Apr 12 Meeting Minutes

http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/view.cgi/P1800/SvbcMinutes20160412

Dave Rich moves to approve.

Mark H seconds.

No opposed.

Abstain: Jonathan (not present)

Motion passes.

  • Action Item Review

Complete

  • Email Vote Results

Yes: 1188, 3562, 3548, 3763, 5217, 5571

Almost Yes/merit discussion: 4275, 5569

4275 stays as Yes.

AI: Shalom file Mantis item for missing entries in Table 6-7 and/or Table 7-1.

5569 stays as Yes

No: 2500, 2831, 3531, 4528, 4939, 5540, 5594

No & Need more work: 5540, 5594, 4939 and 2500

No & Discuss: 3531 & 4528

3531

Shalom suggests opening a new Mantis to address which constant_primaries can or cannot be used as a casting_type. He later reviewed the open Mantis items and identified 1598 as an issue covering exactly this topic.

MarkS moves to approve 3531

Steven seconds.

No opposed.

No abstain.

Motion passes.

5571

Committee discussed the "Null string" in 20.18.1 and agreed that it should not be changed.

Shalom moves to approve 5571 with the above note.

Steven seconds.

No opposed

No abstain

Motion passes.

4528

Agreed to pursue if 343 is approved.

AI: Matt add 343 to the next email ballot

AI: Matt add 4528 to future email vote if 343 is approved

AI: Matt update all Mantis items per April 25/26 voting results.

2831

Shalom believes event types need to be added. Jonathan agreed. These may also affect the tables 6-7 and/or 7-1.

AI: Jonathan to update 2831 for future vote

2500

Discussion whether this is an enhancement. Several state this appears to be an omission.

MarkS moves to approve 2500.

MarkH seconds.

No opposed.

No abstain.

Motion passes.

4939

Reviewed -5 proposal. Last bullet appears to be converging. Focused on penultimate bullet about 4-state values. Version -5 adds reference to enum named values.

Jonathan would like the wording to be improved as he feels its meaning is still unclear. Agree that this should be addressed by a different Mantis.

DaveR would prefer to not update the bullet that discusses 'Constraints support only 2-state values'

General agreement that constraint wording can be improved but how appears to be beyond the scope of current work. Group aligning toward accepting only the final bullet in proposal 5.

Steven asked if wording needs to be added that clarifies how named values are converted to their numeric values. Enum named values used in expressions are already converted to their corresponding numeric value according to the LRM. Ray gave an example of a rand enum variable as applicable to Steven's point. Steven willing to drop this point if others are not concerned. Others confirmed that they are willing to omit this point.

Proposal -8 now only adds a new bullet.

Ray moves to accept proposal -8.

Justin seconds.

No opposed.

No abstain.

Motion passes.

9:59am PDT: Justin moves to adjourn

MarkH seconds

-- Matt Maidment - 2016-05-09

Comments

Topic revision: r2 - 2016-05-13 - 18:03:41 - MattMaidment
 
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback