TWiki
>
P1800 Web
>
SystemVerilogAssertionCommittee
>
SVACMeetingMinutes
>
SV-AC_Minutes_2016_07_13
(2016-07-15,
ErikSeligman
)
(raw view)
E
dit
A
ttach
Minutes from SV-AC Committee Meeting Date: 2016-07-13 Time: 16.00:00 UTC (9:00 PDT) Duration: 1 hour *Agenda* * Reminder of IEEE patent policy<br /> See: http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt * Minutes approval * Email ballot results * Mantis items in progress * Opens *Attendance Record* <u>Legend:</u> x = attended - = missed r = represented . = not yet a member v = valid voter (2 out of last 3 or 3/4 overall) n = not a valid voter t = chair eligible to vote only to make or break a tie Attendance re-initialized on 2016-03-09: n[.x-xxxxx--] Mehbub Ali (Intel) n[.xx--x----] Ang Boon Chong (Intel) n[x-x-xx-x-x] Shalom Bresticker (Accellera) n[.x--------] Dennis Brophy (Mentor Graphics) v[xxxxxxxxxx] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys) v[xx-xx-xxxx] Ben Cohen (Accellera) t[x-xxxxxx-x] Dmitry Korchemny (Synopsys - Chair) n[xxx-x-x--] Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics) v[xxxxxxxx-x] Anupam Prabhakar (Mentor Graphics) v[xxxxxxxxxx] Erik Seligman (Intel – Co-chair) n[x-x-xxxx-x] Samik Sengupta (Synopsys) |- attendance on 2016-07-13 |--- voting eligibility on 2016-07-13 *Minutes* <u>IEEE patent policy reminder</u> <u>Minutes approval</u> Ben: Move to approve the minutes from 1-Jun-2016. Samik: Second. Motion passed: 4y/0n/0a. <u>Email ballot results</u> N/A <u>Mantis items in progress</u> Mantis items ready to vote: 2546 and 4557 3610: Sequence methods with sequences admitting empty match Erik: Based on the recent mail exchange I suggest to ignore empty matches in sequences in methods .triggered and .matched. Will submit the proposal in the next days for vote. 3924: Need to clarify behavior when sequence event used as property clocking Ben: Need to clarify in what region sequence event occurs and when sampling is performed. Anupam: According the common rules, sequence values are sampled in the Preponed region, and the event occurs in the Observed region. Anupam: If this construct is not common, why to provide an example in the LRM? Ed: The customers do use it Anupam: Need a more meaningful example for the first sequence in the proposal. Erik will provide an update to 3924. ---++ Comments %COMMENT%
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r1 - 2016-07-15 - 17:53:07 -
ErikSeligman
P1800
Log In
or
Register
P1800 Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
P1076
Ballots
LCS2016_080
P10761
P1647
P16661
P1685
P1734
P1735
P1778
P1800
P1801
Sandbox
TWiki
VIP
VerilogAMS
Copyright © 2008-2026 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback