TWiki
>
P1800 Web
>
SystemVerilogAssertionCommittee
>
SVACMeetingMinutes
>
SV-AC_Minutes_2011_11_01
(2011-11-07,
ErikSeligman
)
(raw view)
E
dit
A
ttach
Minutes of SV-AC Meeting Date: 2011-11-01 Time: 16:00 UTC (9:00 PDT) Duration: 2 hours Dial-in information: -------------------- Meeting ID: 38198 Phone Number(s): 1-888-813-5316 Toll Free within North America Live Meeting: [[https://webjoin.intel.com/?passcode=3930082]] Agenda: ------- - Reminder of IEEE patent policy. See: http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt - Minutes approval - Champions' feedback 2476: Need clarification about system functions $onehot, etc 3069: Relax rules for $global_clock resolution 3145: Need to clearly define "maximal property" 3564: Sec 9.2.2.2.1 needs to clarify whether variables read in an assertion contribute to the sensitivity of an always_comb - Opens Attendance Record: ------------------ Legend: x = attended - = missed r = represented . = not yet a member v = valid voter (2 out of last 3 or 3/4 overall) n = not a valid voter t = chair eligible to vote only to make or break a tie Attendance re-initialized on 2010-07-06: n[--x-xxxxx-xxx--xxx---xxxx-xxx-xxx...........................] Ashok Bhatt (Cadence) n[--------xx--xxx-xxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx-xxx-xxxxxxxxx-x-xxxxx--xxx] Laurence Bisht (Intel) v[xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx-] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys) v[-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxx--------xx---xxx--x-xxxxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxxx] Ben Cohen (Accellera) n[-----------------------------------------xx-x-xxx-x--xxxxxxx] Surrendra Dudani (Synopsys) n[------------x-xxxxxx........................................] Shaun Feng (Freescale) v[xxxxx---------x-x--x-x-xxxx-x-x----x-x-x--xx---xxxx---x-xxxx] Dana Fisman (Synopsys) n[---------------------------------------xxxxx-xxxx-x-xxxxxxxx] John Havlicek (Freescale) v[--xxxxxxxx---x-xxx-xx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx] Tapan Kapoor (Cadence) n[--xx-xxx---x-xx-xxxxx-xxxx-x-x..............................] Jacob Katz (Intel) t[xxxx-xxxxxxxxx--xxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx--xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Dmitry Korchemny (Intel ¿ Chair) v[-xxx-xxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx--xxxxxx-xxxxxxxx] Scott Little (Freescale) v[x-xxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxx] Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics) v[-xx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Anupam Prabhakar (Mentor Graphics) v[-xxxxx-xxxxxxxxx--xxx-xxxx-xxx-xxx--x-xx-xxx-xx--xxxxxxx-xxx] Erik Seligman (Intel) v[xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxx-x-xxx-xxxx-xxxx--xxxxxx-xxxxxxx.] Samik Sengupta (Synopsys) v[xxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx] Tom Thatcher (Oracle ¿ Co-Chair) n[------------------------xx---xx-------x.....................] Srini Venkataramanan (CVC Pvt Ltd) n[--------------x.............................................] Vibarajan Viswanathan (Marvell) |- attendance on 2011-11-01 |--- voting eligibility on 2011-11-01 - Reminder of IEEE patent policy. See: http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt Participants were reminded of the IEEE patent policy - Minutes approval Tom: Move to approve minutes from last meeting Samik: Second Vote Results: 5y, 0n, 0a. - Champions' feedback 2476: Need clarification about system functions $onehot, etc Mainly editorial changes Tom: Move to approve amended proposal Samik: Second Vote results 5y, 0n, 0a 3069: Relax rules for $global_clock resolution Dmitry: Shalom sent feedback early, but Champions e-mail ballot not complete yet Manisha: Default clocking only allows one withing a module. Unclear what happens if a default clocking occurs within a generate block. is it visible to rest of module? Global clocking: searches upward in hierarchy for global clocking Default clocking: does not search upward Question: Should a global clocking inside a Generate block be visible to the rest of the module? Dmitry: Should wait for completion of Champions vote. 3206: Deferred assertions are sensitive to glitches Dmitry: Champions vote has not concluded yet, but Shalom has sent a negative vote. Comments are straightforward. 3145: Need to clearly define "maximal property" Dmitry: Problem was that a requirement was contained in a footnote. Footnotes are only for informative text. Dmitry: Erik has already updated the proposal, but he deleted the old one, so it's hard to see what the change was. Dana: Why wasn't definition put into the glossary? Manisha: At the time, it was thought that the glossary was incomplete, and that the reader would not automatically look in the glossary. Dmitry: Will call for an e-mail vote 3564: Sec 9.2.2.2.1 needs to clarify whether variables read in an assertion contribute to the sensitivity of an always_comb Dmitry: Objection was that there was no statement about whether new rules applied to always @* procedures. Manisha: Existing text shows differences between always_comb and always @* The always @* is not sensitive to function arguments to function call. Add a sentence in this section. Manisha will update the section. - Opens Dmitry: Will call a meeting next week if there is more feedback to discuss Otherwise, we will cancel the meeting.
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r1 - 2011-11-07 - 21:43:03 -
ErikSeligman
P1800
Log In
or
Register
P1800 Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
P1076
Ballots
LCS2016_080
P10761
P1647
P16661
P1685
P1734
P1735
P1778
P1800
P1801
Sandbox
TWiki
VIP
VerilogAMS
Copyright © 2008-2026 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback