TWiki
>
P1800 Web
>
SystemVerilogAssertionCommittee
>
SVACMeetingMinutes
>
SV-AC_Minutes_2011_09_13
(2011-09-13,
ErikSeligman
)
(raw view)
E
dit
A
ttach
Minutes of SV-AC Meeting Date: 2011-09-13 Time: 16:00 UTC (9:00 PDT) Duration: 2 hours Dial-in information: -------------------- Meeting ID: 38198 Phone Number(s): 1-888-813-5316 Toll Free within North America Live Meeting: [[https://webjoin.intel.com/?passcode=2266887]] Agenda: ------- - Reminder of IEEE patent policy. See: http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt - Minutes approval - Email ballot results: 2093: Checker construct should permit output arguments - Issue resolution/discussion 2093: Checker construct should permit output arguments 3145: Need to clearly define "maximal property" Attendance Record: ------------------ Legend: x = attended - = missed r = represented . = not yet a member v = valid voter (2 out of last 3 or 3/4 overall) n = not a valid voter t = chair eligible to vote only to make or break a tie Attendance re-initialized on 2010-07-06: v[xxxxx-xxx--xxx---xxxx-xxx-xxx...........................] Ashok Bhatt (Cadence) v[----xx--xxx-xxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx-xxx-xxxxxxxxx-x-xxxxx--xxx] Laurence Bisht (Intel) v[-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx-] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys) v[xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxx--------xx---xxx--x-xxxxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxxx] Ben Cohen (Accellera) n[-------------------------------------xx-x-xxx-x--xxxxxxx] Surrendra Dudani (Synopsys) n[--------x-xxxxxx........................................] Shaun Feng (Freescale) n[x---------x-x--x-x-xxxx-x-x----x-x-x--xx---xxxx---x-xxxx] Dana Fisman (Synopsys) n[-----------------------------------xxxxx-xxxx-x-xxxxxxxx] John Havlicek (Freescale) v[xxxxxx---x-xxx-xx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx] Tapan Kapoor (Cadence) v[-xxx---x-xx-xxxxx-xxxx-x-x..............................] Jacob Katz (Intel) t[-xxxxxxxxx--xxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx--xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Dmitry Korchemny (Intel ¿ Chair) v[-xxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx--xxxxxx-xxxxxxxx] Scott Little (Freescale) v[xxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxx] Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics) v[xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Anupam Prabhakar (Mentor Graphics) v[xx-xxxxxxxxx--xxx-xxxx-xxx-xxx--x-xx-xxx-xx--xxxxxxx-xxx] Erik Seligman (Intel) v[x-xxxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxx-x-xxx-xxxx-xxxx--xxxxxx-xxxxxxx.] Samik Sengupta (Synopsys) v[xxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx-xxx] Tom Thatcher (Oracle ¿ Co-Chair) n[--------------------xx---xx-------x.....................] Srini Venkataramanan (CVC Pvt Ltd) n[----------x.............................................] Vibarajan Viswanathan (Marvell) |- attendance on 2011-09-13 |--- voting eligibility on 2011-09-13 Minutes: -------- - Reminder of IEEE patent policy. See: http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt Participants were reminded of the IEEE Patent policy. - Minutes approval Erik: : Move to approve meeting minutes Samik : Second Vote Results: 6y, 0n, 0a - Email ballot results: 2093: Checker construct should permit output arguments Failed: 1 no vote (Manisha joined) - Issue resolution/discussion 2093: Checker construct should permit output arguments Manisha: Explained reasons for no vote Dmitry not here today. He'll address corrections this week and discuss next week. 3145: Need to clearly define "maximal property" Erik: Ed was assigned as reviewer. He's on vacation now. Will wait for him to return. 3564: Do assertions contribute to sensitivity list of always_comb? Anupam: Considering to write a proposal. Suggesting that assertions do not change sensitivity list. Assertions should not change behavior of design. Erik: Stand-alone deferred assertion is interpreted as a deferred assertion in its own always_comb block. You want the always block triggered the last time that the variable changes. Even concurrent assertions could use const value Ben: Difference between immediate, deferred, and concurrent assertions? Erik: In most real-life cases the extra triggering of the always_comb will not change the result. Erik: The only case where an assertion doesn't contribute to sensitivity list would be a concurrent assertion using a sensitivity list. Anupam: But it might be difficult to check for const cast to determine whether to trigger block again. Manisha: If concurrent assertion is inside an "if", the evaluation could be queued, but could be flushed if always block triggered again. Anupam: Will write a proposal. Meeting adjourned.
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r1 - 2011-09-13 - 19:49:43 -
ErikSeligman
P1800
Log In
or
Register
P1800 Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
P1076
Ballots
LCS2016_080
P10761
P1647
P16661
P1685
P1734
P1735
P1778
P1800
P1801
Sandbox
TWiki
VIP
VerilogAMS
Copyright © 2008-2026 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback