TWiki
>
P1735 Web
>
P1735PublicDocuments
>
P1735Minutes2013Nov11
(2013-11-25,
DaveGraubart
)
(raw view)
E
dit
A
ttach
---++ IEEE P1735 Working Group Meeting of November 11, 2013 ---+++ Meeting Info [[P1735MeetingInfo][Conference Bridge and Live-Meeting]] ---+++ Participants * Attending * Steven Dovich, (chair) * Krista Gluchoski, IEEE Professional Services * Dave Graubart, Synopsys _DR_ * Ray Martin, Xilinx _DR_ * Dave Clemans, Synopsys _DRA_ * John Shields, Mentor _DR_ * Jonathan Goldberg, IEEE Professional Services * Michael Smith, Synopsys _DRA_ * Dmitry Melnick, Aldec _DR_ * Stan Krolikoski, Cadence (DASC Chair) * Not Attending * Jeff Fox, Altera _DR_ * Joe Daniels, P1735 Technical Editor * Devin Sundaram, Altera DRA * Parminder Gill, Synopsys _DRA_ * Premduth Vidyanandan, Xilinx * Nick Sgoupis, CAST * Albert Chiang, Synopsys * Nitin Khurana, Cadence _DRA_ * David Pena, Cadence * Bin Dai, Xilinx * Ruchi Tyagi, Cadence _DRA_ * Syed Huq, Cisco * Meera Srinivasan, Synopsys * David Tran, Synopsys ---+++ Agenda 1 Determine Quorum 1 [[http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.pdf][Patent slides]] 1 Approve agenda 1 Approval of Previous Meeting minutes 1 Action Items Status 1 Liaison Reports 1 Inter-operability Issues 1 License Management 1 Key Management 1 Rights Management 1 Common Rights and Visibility 1 Work Plan 1 Other Business 1 Adjourn ---+++ Minutes ---++++ Attendance/Quorum We have 4/6 eligible entities, and have a working quorum. ---++++ Patent Policy The [[http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.pdf][Patent slides]] were offered for review. No new claims were disclosed at the call for essential patent claims. ---++++ Agenda Approval Motion by John, seconded by Dave G. Motion is approved. ---++++ Previous Minutes Dave G moved and John seconded the approval of the [[P1735Minutes2013Oct28][October 28, 2013]] minutes. The motion was approved. ---++++ Action Item Review Steven reviewed the open action items. | Date | Clause | Title | Champion | Status | | 7/15 | 1 | Intro | Steven | | | 7/8 | 2 | Normative Ref | ? | | | 7/12 | 3 | Definitions | ? | | | 7/16 | 4 | Trust | Steven | | | 7/19 | 5 | Interop | Ray | done | | 7/17 | 6 | Key Mgmt | Steven | done | | 6/21 | 7 | Rights Mgmt | Dave G | done | | 7/8 | 8 | License Mgmt | Dave G | done | | 6/28 | 9 | Common Rights | John | done | | 7/10 | 10 | Visibility | John | done | | 7/8 | A | Bibliography | ? | | | 6/28 | B | Required Algorithms | ? | | | 4/25 | X | Visibility Annex | John | done | ---++++ Liaison Reports PAR extension is under review by NESCOM members in preparation for the December meeting, and all questions to date have been resolved to their satisfaction. ---++++ Inter-operability ---++++ License Management ---++++ Key Management John noted that the changes to identify operational trust through the tool have not completely resolved the issue. He will share those notes on the reflector and Steve agreed to revise the clause. ---++++ Rights Management ---++++ Common Rights and Visibility ---++++ Work Plan ---+++++ Liaison Review Comments ---+++++ High-level objectives: * Complete all approval activity in 2013 before PAR expires (2013) * Secure pre-ballot feedback from other DASC working groups ---+++++ Project Plan: * Distribute D3 draft for liaison review in mid-February * Revised content for D3 must be submitted to Joe by 11-Feb-2013 *[COMPLETED]* * D3 to be distributed to liaison groups by 20-Feb-2013 *[COMPLETED]* * Any material that is still unstable should be tagged with an inline note to the liaison reviewers *[COMPLETED]* * Noted material should be revised for mid-review update as D3a by 25-Feb-2013 (delivery to Joe) *[COMPLETED]* * Any updated D3a clauses will be supplied to liaison reviewers by 01-Mar-2013 *[COMPLETED]* * Liaison review period to close by 12-Apr-2013 * Incorporate review comments into D4 draft for working group review * ( *Needs timeline review by Technical Editor*) * Changes for D4 must be submitted by 09-Sep-2013 (delivery to Joe) * Working group review closes 30-Sep-2013 with a decision to approve D4 as the MEC review draft or revise further as D5. * MEC review requires 30 days and must be completed prior to ballot, initial target is 01-Oct-2013 * Balloting and review ( *Needs review by Technical Editor*) * ( *Needs timeline review by Technical Editor*) * Review comments (MEC and WG) need to be processed and relevant changes provided to Joe by 11-Nov-2013. * If D5 is approved as ballot draft by 25-Nov-2013, the ballot period starts 01-Dec-2013, we should be able to make the December REVCOM agenda * Ballot group formation to close before 30-Oct-2013 in preparation for possible D5 ballot. * Assumptions: * PAR extension will be approved * Need approval of D5 as ballot draft by 25-Nov-2013 * 30-day ballot period requires a minimum of 45 days from working group approval of ballot draft * 10-day recirc period requires a minimum of 15 days from ballot comment disposition * Ballot comment dispositioning and incorporating draft updates accepted by the working group will add to the timeline * Current technical editing statement of work (contract and budget) will still be valid if D5 is completed and approved for ballot. * Additional unbudgeted editing work in 2014 would likely required an additional assessment of $2000 per entity. | *Task* | *Requirements/White Paper* | *Writer-ready Specification* | | Use Model | 02-Jul-2008 | ??? | | Trust Model | ??? | ??? | | Interoperability | 24-Aug-2009 | 26-Jan-2010 | | License Management | 19-Apr-2011 | ??? | | Visibility Management | 23-Jul-2010 | ??? | | Key Management | 18-Oct-2010 | 12-Aug-2011 | | Rights Control Structures | 27-Jun-2011 | ??? | | Common Rights | 23-Jul-2011 | ??? | ---++++ Other Business Dmitry introduced himself to the working group, replacing Jarek as the Aldec DR. John asked Krista if there were restrictions on who could serve as a DRA for the working group. Krista noted that there was no IEEE restriction on DRA status but that officer eligibility requires DR status according to the P1735 P&P. John asked about requirements for the MEC review and any other immediate milestones. Steven noted that the MEC review was not a schedule constraint, and should start whenever our review draft was ready for the IEEE editors. Krista confirmed that and indicated that MEC review and ballot group formation usually run concurrently, since both require a 30 day window in the schedule. ---+++ Next Meeting The next [[P1735MeetingInfo][P1735 meeting]] is scheduled for November 25, 2013 at 16:00UTC. *Tentative Agenda* 1 Determine Quorum 1 [[http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.pdf][Patent slides]] 1 Approve agenda 1 Approval of Previous Meeting minutes 1 Action Items Status 1 Liaison Reports 1 Meeting Schedule 1 Inter-operability Issues 1 License Management 1 Key Management 1 Rights Management 1 Common Rights and Visibility 1 Work Plan 1 Other Business 1 Adjourn ---++++ Adjournment Motion by John, second by Dave G. Approved by acclamation at 16:54UTC ---+++ Approval These minutes are approved. -- Main.StevenDovich - 2013-11-11
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r3 - 2013-11-25 - 19:04:31 -
DaveGraubart
P1735
Log In
or
Register
P1735 Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
P1076
Ballots
LCS2016_080
P10761
P1647
P16661
P1685
P1734
P1735
P1778
P1800
P1801
Sandbox
TWiki
VIP
VerilogAMS
Copyright © 2008-2026 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback