TWiki
>
P1735 Web
>
P1735PublicDocuments
>
P1735Minutes2012Mar5
(2012-03-19,
StevenDovich
)
(raw view)
E
dit
A
ttach
---++ IEEE P1735 Working Group Meeting of March 5, 2012 ---+++ Meeting Info [[P1735MeetingInfo][Conference Bridge and Live-Meeting]] ---+++ Participants * Attending * Steven Dovich, Cadence _DR_ * Michael Smith, Synopsys _DRA_ * Dave Graubart, Synopsys _DR_ * Ray Martin, Xilinx _DR_ * Bassam Tabbara, Synopsys * Dave Clemans, Synopsys _DRA_ * Jarek Kaczynski, Aldec _DR_ * Joe Daniels, Self * Parminder Gill, Synopsys _DRA_ * John Shields, Mentor _DR_ * Not Attending * Premduth Vidyanandan, Xilinx * Nick Sgoupis, CAST * Albert Chiang, Synopsys * Nitin Khurana, Cadence _DRA_ * David Pena, Cadence * Karlton Lau, Xilinx * Gary Delp, Accellera/Silver Loon Systems * Bin Dai, Xilinx * Ruchi Tyagi, Cadence _DRA_ * Syed Huq, Cisco * William A Hanna, Boeing * Meera Srinivasan, Synopsys * Jim Robinson, Synopsys * NSS Subramanian, Cadence * David Tran, Synopsys ---+++ Agenda 1 Determine Quorum 1 [[http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.pdf][Patent slides]] 1 Approve agenda 1 Approval of Meeting minutes from 02/06/2012 1 Action Items Status 1 Liaison Reports 1 Inter-operability Issues 1 License Management 1 Key Management 1 Rights Management 1 Common Rights and Visibility 1 Work Plan 1 Other Business 1 Adjourn ---+++ Minutes ---++++ Attendance/Quorum We have 5/6 eligible entities, and have a working quorum. ---++++ Patent Policy The [[http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.pdf][Patent slides]] were offered for review. No new claims were disclosed at the call for essential patent claims. ---++++ Agenda Approval Motion by Jarek, seconded by Dave G. Motion is approved. ---++++ Previous Minutes Ray moved and Dave G seconded the approval of the [[P1735Minutes2012Feb6][February 6, 2011]] minutes. The motion was approved. ---++++ Action Item Review Steven reviewed the open action items. ---++++ Liaison Reports Steven is working w/ IEEE SA Professional Services on Technical Editor contracts. ---++++ Inter-operability Jarek noted that he had posted a set of issues to the reflector and is currently reviewing a few areas of concern. Feedback from working group members will help finish up the review. John noted that his internal interoperability work was aligning with Jarek's recommendations and had not be noticed during development. Jarek flagged compatibility for IP owners implementing encryption scripts as a primary concern. John noted that P1076 would be the likeliest place for issues, and Jarek indicated that he was already working with the P1076 chair to smooth acceptance. John pointed out that our status as a recommendation document could resolve this without imposing further constraints in the VHDL LRM. Jarek suggested that the Rights encryption process be documented from the standpoint of someone unfamiliar with current pragma processing and encryption tools. ---++++ License Management Dave G reported that Synopsys had internal discussions in progress to bring a recommendation forward to the working group. He expects a proposal to the reflector shortly. ---++++ Key Management ---++++ Rights Management Dave G requested that we schedule an approval vote for the Rights Management recommendations. Steven agreed to call for that vote in the next meeting. ---++++ Common Rights and Visibility ---++++ Work Plan | *Task* | *Requirements/White Paper* | *Writer-ready Specification* | | Use Model | 02-Jul-2008 | %RED%???%ENDCOLOR% | | Trust Model | %RED%???%ENDCOLOR% | %RED%???%ENDCOLOR% | | Interoperability | 24-Aug-2009 | 26-Jan-2010 | | License Management | 19-Apr-2011 | %RED%???%ENDCOLOR% | | Visibility Management | 23-Jul-2010 | %RED%???%ENDCOLOR% | | Key Management | 18-Oct-2010 | 12-Aug-2011 | | Rights Control Structures | 27-Jun-2011 | %RED%???%ENDCOLOR% | | Common Rights | 23-Jul-2011 | %RED%???%ENDCOLOR% | ---++++ Other Business Dave G sent out a statement on Key Scope, and is working on additional rationale before preparing a proposed recommendation. Dave G described a possible issue with the handling of compiler directives when encrypting. The examples are handling of macros and include directives in the protected region. John noted that lots of these issues can all have several mutually incompatible but desirable outcomes. Steven noted that feature control and/or diagnostics could be specified for either the encryption or decryption phases of the protected IP flow. John asked for feedback from the IP producer community to help shape the consensus in this area. ---+++ Next Meeting The next [[P1735MeetingInfo][P1735 meeting]] is scheduled for March 19, 2012 at 16:00UTC. *Tentative Agenda* 1 Determine Quorum 1 [[http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.pdf][Patent slides]] 1 Approve agenda 1 Approval of Meeting minutes from 03/05/2012 1 Action Items Status 1 Liaison Reports 1 Meeting Schedule 1 Inter-operability Issues 1 License Management 1 Key Management 1 Rights Management 1 Common Rights and Visibility 1 Work Plan 1 Other Business 1 Adjourn ---++++ Adjournment Motion by Dave G, second by Jarek. Approved by acclamation at 17:12UTC ---+++ Approval These minutes are unapproved. -- Main.StevenDovich - 2012-03-05
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r3 - 2012-03-19 - 14:45:36 -
StevenDovich
P1735
Log In
or
Register
P1735 Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
P1076
Ballots
LCS2016_080
P10761
P1647
P16661
P1685
P1734
P1735
P1778
P1800
P1801
Sandbox
TWiki
VIP
VerilogAMS
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback