TWiki
>
P10761 Web
>
WGMeetingMinutes
>
WGMmJuly1409
(revision 13) (raw view)
Edit
Attach
---++ IEEE P1076.1 Working Group Telco Meeting Minutes - July 14, 2009 8am PDT (15:00 GMT) *Status:* Approved by WG on 18 August 2009. %TOC% ---+++ Attendees * Ken Bakalar * Ernst Christen (chair, meeting convener) * Joachim Haase * John Shields * David Smith * Alain Vachoux (note taker) ---+++ Agenda 1 Call to order 1 Approval of agenda 1 Administrative issues 1 Recent activities 1 Call for participation 1 Review of IEEE patent policy 1 Revision Ballot of IEEE Std 1076.1.1 1 Planning for next revision of IEEE Std 1076.1 1 Next meeting 1 AOB 1 Adjourn ---+++ 1. Call to order on July 14, 2009 at 8:03 PDT Ernst welcomed the participants and started presenting the [[%ATTACHURL%/090714_mtg_slides.pdf][meeting slides]]. ---+++ 2. Approval of Agenda Agenda unanimously approved. ---+++ 3. Administrative Issues * *Slide #4:* WG Status * John mentioned that, even if Accellera is entity-based, the IEEE WG to which an Accellera approved standard is transferred is not forced to be also entity-based, although this is encouraged. * *Slide #5:* WG Membership * A new fresh WG roster will be build from the first next WG vote. * *Slide #6:* Web Site * New Twiki web site under construction. Some information moved and updated from previous web site. * Alain to tell David when the old URL (!http://www.eda.org/vhdl-ams) can be redirected to the Twiki home and the eda.org page can be updated with the new URL. * *Slide #9:* Call for Participation * Ernst proposed to also contact former balloters of 1076.1 and 1076.1.1. * John proposed to also add the balloters of 1076, even if they may not be primarily concerned with AMS extensions. Approved. * Alain proposed to also consider the ECSI organization. Approved. ---+++ 4. Review of IEEE Patent Policy * Ernst presented the [[%PUBURL%/P10761/WebHome/pat-slideset.pdf][IEEE Patent Policy slides]]. * Alain asked if the slides have to be presented at each meeting. Ernst suggested that only the first slide would be needed. * John mentioned that it is enough to make a statement at the beginning of each meeting that there is a policy and everybody can find the information on the IEEE SA web site (http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.pdf) or on the WG web site. ---+++ 5. Revision Ballot of IEEE Std 1076.1.1 * Ernst will initiate a working group vote on the draft P1076.1.1 PAR in a few days with a 14 day response time. ---+++ 6. Planning for Next Revision of IEEE Std 1076.1 * IP protection * John mentioned the work of the [[P1735.WebHome][P1735 WG]] whose charter is to develop industry interoperability rules. Pragmatic approach, easy-to-implement rules. Digital rights to be addressed next year. * Ernst asked about the implications on HDLs. * John replied that this would be in the form of modified or new pragmas. * David stressed that P1735 cannot change VHDL or (System)Verilog standards. * John replied that this would be only recommendations to other standards. Actually, there is a common set of members in P1735, P1076 and P1364/1800. * David raised the issue of P1735 and P1076 being (re)issued at the same time. * Ernst concluded that 1076.1 will first include the IP support offered by 1076-2008. * VHPI * Need to review the status of previous work on VHPI for VHDL-AMS (work from Martin Vlach). * David proposed to ask for possible donation from EDA vendors who have done some work in this domain. * Generic types and packages * More detailed analysis on the implications to 1076.1 is required. * PSL * David thought this should be a separate issue when upgrading 1076.1 to 1076-2008. Should be considered as an extension to 1076.1. * Ken stressed that the effort to support [[VerilogAMS.AmsAssertions][Verilog-AMS assertions]] is not primarily interesting. It is better to consider extending PSL to AMS. * David suggested to consider !SystemVerilog assertions. * John noticed that the incorporation of 1076-2008 will only concern the digital context and there should be some provision to prevent the analog context to be included in PSL statements. * External names should include quantities. * The importance mentioned in slides 15 to 20 is Ernst's perspective. This should be anyway determine through a WG poll/vote. * Mixed netlists * Ken mentioned that each EDA vendor has proprietary means to support automatic insertion of interface (conversion) elements. * Parameter sweep * David stressed that this is more a tool (control language) issue: amount of re-elaboration, incremental elaboration. * Table-driven modeling * Joachim made a proposal, but no progress on that for the moment. * Pass function name as parameter * John mentioned that 1076-2008 only considers static passing at elaboration time. * Ernst confirmed that the requirement is to have static definition only. * Unified use of SPICE models * Joachim reported on VDA efforts. Only a subset of SPICE primitives has been developed (see the [[http://fat-ak30.eas.iis.fraunhofer.de/vdalibs/doc/frames.html][SPICE2VHD library]]) following the guidelines described in this [[%PUBURL%/P10761/WorkingGroupDocuments/Spice_in_vhdl-ams_0.6.pdf][proposal document]] and the same effort done for Verilog-AMS. See also the full [[http://fat-ak30.eas.iis.fraunhofer.de/mb/index_en.html][VDA library]] available at http://fat-ak30.eas.iis.fraunhofer.de/mb/index_en.html. * There is still the need to understand the scope and the objectives before considering the integration in 1076.1. * Unified C interface * David suggested to consider the Direct C interface in !SystemVerilog. * Support of HIL simulators * Early requirements have been defined by Eduard Moser ( [[http://%HTTP_HOST%/vhdl-ams-old/ftp_files/wp/rt_subset_draft.txt][text document]] of Dec. 2, 1999). * Standard symbol format * David reported on the [[http://fat-ak30.eas.iis.fraunhofer.de/exchange/index_en.html][SVG-based symbol exchange format]]. Currently defines a mapping from 1076.1 language elements to SVG. Difficult to include graphical information (attributes) in 1076.1. * Frequency-domain modeling * Joachim's [[%PUBURL%/P10761/WorkingGroupDocuments/Haase_FDL09.pdf][proposal]] to be presented at FDL'09. * Planning of 1076.1 revision * David stressed the need to define a prioritization of importance. * John proposed to include the revision process in the PAR, e.g., what is in scope and what is out of scope. * Ernst thought that we need some perspective on that before we can include it in the PAR. * John thought that having champions does matter, but the working group community must agree on the importance, the scope and the objectives. * David suggested that we may need feedback from outside the working group, e.g., VDA, etc. * John suggested also briefing the DASC. * Ernst replied that he is regularly attending DASC meetings, giving updates on the WG activities. ---+++ 7. Next Meeting * Ernst proposed to have a telco each first Tuesday of the month at 3pm GMT. Approved. * Alain to organize a face-to-face meeting at FDL'09 (Sept. 22-24). Telco will be required. Internet access also, if possible. ---+++ 8. AOB None. ---+++ 9. Adjourn Ernst adjourned the meeting at 9:15 PDT.
Attachments
Attachments
I
Attachment
Action
Size
Date
Who
Comment
pdf
090714_mtg_slides.pdf
manage
333.0 K
2009-07-16 - 16:48
AlainVachoux
Meeting slides of July 14, 2009
Edit
|
Attach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
:
r17
|
r15
<
r14
<
r13
<
r12
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Raw edit
|
More topic actions...
Topic revision: r1 - 2016-01-26 - 18:16:42 -
TWikiGuest
P10761
Log In
or
Register
P10761 Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
P1076
Ballots
LCS2016_080
P10761
P1647
P16661
P1685
P1734
P1735
P1778
P1800
P1801
Sandbox
TWiki
VIP
VerilogAMS
Copyright © 2008-2026 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback