TWiki
>
P1076 Web
>
Vhdl2019MeetingMinutes
>
2013_MeetingJune27
(2020-02-17,
JimLewis
)
(raw view)
E
dit
A
ttach
<!-- * Set ALLOWTOPICCHANGE = P1076AdminGroup --> ---+ P1076 June 27, 2013 Meeting Minutes ---++ Attendees: * Main.JimLewis * Main.PeterFlake * Main.CliffordWalinsky * Main.RyanHinton * Main.JarekKaczynski ---++ Agenda: * Revisit VHDL-2008-MP items (just 2 to revisit, notes from last meeting copied here) * Review VHDL-2008-TBV 6, 9, and 13 * Check closure on AI from review lists. * See these items in the <a target="_top" href="Vhdl2019CollectedRequirements">collected requirements list</a> ---++ Review of VHDL-2008-MP * MP - Remove white space requirement in physical literals * A small issue, not necessarily worth doing this revision. * Ambiguity if have a physical literal identifier named 'e' and bit string literals * Confusing for those who work in mixed language environments. * SystemVerilog requires no space with their physical literals. * Drop for this revision * MP - Longest static prefix issue with loops * If Globally static, may be solvable. Cliff to continue looking into it. ---++ Review of VHDL-2008-TBV 6, 9, and 13 * TBV 6 - Assign image values for identifier-based enumeration type values * VHDL term image does not have any meaning here. * Assuming it wants to impact the state mapping of a statemachine * type StateType is (S0 := 3, S1 := 5, S3 :=6) ; * Does it redefine position values (is it ok having 'pos be sparse?) or * is it some new thing with its own version of 'pos and 'val * Historically its has been done with attributes. * attribute enum_encoding of TxStateType : type is "0011 0110 1100 0101 1010 1001" ; * Could instead create new attribute based on integer_vector that would accomplish the same thing. * Make the attribute a standard attribute. * Is it worth doing? * Ryan - probably would not use. * Drop * TBV 9 - Expected Value Detectors * Create a verification library / package. * Need further information on requirement. * Drop for lack of information. * TBV 13 - Object Orientation * Suave? * Is there a Suave pre-compiler that would translate suave code into regular VHDL? * Protected Types? * Have a fairly complete proposal * What is the target application? * Used by system level designers? * ADA style vs C style? * System level designers commonly use C * Can we solve this by binding to C and/or ADA? * Does the DPI proposal cover this? * Add to proposal list and address during ranking of proposals. ---++ Review and Approve Meeting Minutes: * Motion: Jerry 2nd: Ryan ---++ Next Meeting Date: Thursday July 18, 8 am Pacific
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r4
<
r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r4 - 2020-02-17 - 15:36:12 -
JimLewis
P1076
Log In
or
Register
P1076 Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
P1076
Ballots
LCS2016_080
P10761
P1647
P16661
P1685
P1734
P1735
P1778
P1800
P1801
Sandbox
TWiki
VIP
VerilogAMS
Copyright © 2008-2026 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback