Re: [vhdl-200x-ft] Proposals 1164 CP-003 and 1076.3 N-002

David,
Handled by FT-03. Now once we have rolled in
1164 and 1076.3, I was wondering if we should
not be rolling some of the proposals together.

So as part of FT-03, it needs to be done.
Want to do it?

Cheers,
Jim

>
> These proposals represent the following functions:
>
> FUNCTION "and" ( l : std_logic_vector; r : std_ulogic ) RETURN
> std_logic_vector;
> FUNCTION "and" ( l : std_ulogic_vector; r : std_ulogic ) RETURN
> std_ulogic_vector;
> FUNCTION "and" ( l : std_ulogic; r : std_logic_vector ) RETURN
> std_logic_vector;
> FUNCTION "and" ( l : std_ulogic; r : std_ulogic_vector ) RETURN
> std_ulogic_vector;
> FUNCTION "nand" ( l : std_logic_vector; r : std_ulogic ) RETURN
> std_logic_vector;
> FUNCTION "nand" ( l : std_ulogic_vector; r : std_ulogic ) RETURN
> std_ulogic_vector;
> FUNCTION "nand" ( l : std_ulogic; r : std_logic_vector ) RETURN
> std_logic_vector;
> FUNCTION "nand" ( l : std_ulogic; r : std_ulogic_vector ) RETURN
> std_ulogic_vector;
> FUNCTION "or" ( l : std_logic_vector; r : std_ulogic ) RETURN
> std_logic_vector;
> ....
>
> I have included these into std_logic_1164, and numeric_std.
> However in copying these functions from numeric_std to numeric_bit
> I fund that there are no overloads such as the following:
>
> FUNCTION "and" ( l : bit_vector; r : bit ) RETURN bit_vector;
>
> Should I add these to the "std.standard" package for consistency?
>

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Lewis
Director of Training             mailto:Jim@SynthWorks.com
SynthWorks Design Inc.           http://www.SynthWorks.com
1-503-590-4787
Expert VHDL Training for Hardware Design and Verification
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~