RE: [vhdl-200x-ft] Proposals 1164 CP-003 and 1076.3 N-002

Hi David,

Yes, it would be appropriate to add bit/bit_vector versions to standard.

-Steve Bailey

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org
> [mailto:owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org <mailto:owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org> ] On Behalf Of David Bishop
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:12 AM
> To: vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org
> Subject: [vhdl-200x-ft] Proposals 1164 CP-003 and 1076.3 N-002
>
>
> These proposals represent the following functions:
>
> FUNCTION "and" ( l : std_logic_vector; r : std_ulogic
> ) RETURN std_logic_vector;
> FUNCTION "and" ( l : std_ulogic_vector; r : std_ulogic
> ) RETURN std_ulogic_vector;
> FUNCTION "and" ( l : std_ulogic; r : std_logic_vector
> ) RETURN std_logic_vector;
> FUNCTION "and" ( l : std_ulogic; r : std_ulogic_vector
> ) RETURN std_ulogic_vector;
> FUNCTION "nand" ( l : std_logic_vector; r : std_ulogic
> ) RETURN std_logic_vector;
> FUNCTION "nand" ( l : std_ulogic_vector; r : std_ulogic
> ) RETURN std_ulogic_vector;
> FUNCTION "nand" ( l : std_ulogic; r : std_logic_vector
> ) RETURN std_logic_vector;
> FUNCTION "nand" ( l : std_ulogic; r : std_ulogic_vector
> ) RETURN std_ulogic_vector;
> FUNCTION "or" ( l : std_logic_vector; r : std_ulogic ) RETURN
> std_logic_vector;
> ....
>
> I have included these into std_logic_1164, and numeric_std.
> However in copying these functions from numeric_std to
> numeric_bit I fund that there are no overloads such as the following:
>
> FUNCTION "and" ( l : bit_vector; r : bit ) RETURN bit_vector;
>
> Should I add these to the "std.standard" package for consistency?
>
> --
> David W. Bishop dbishop@vhdl.org All standard disclaimers apply.
>
>
Received on Thu Jul 1 07:27:32 2004