Thank you, this is great. I have pursued the GoogleDrive avenue that was proposed at the meeting, but haven't set up anything yet. The difficulty there is setting up a sharing model that scales to the WG level. I have made a request to our liaison at IEEE-SA to get some advice on this; given that at least one Working Group is using GD there may be some recommendations. No response so far, but your work will reduce the urgency for that as it enables us to hold the Requirements discussion in a familiar environment. I'll update the HeterogeneousInterfaceRequirements later today as you suggest.
Please note that the link in Brent's email has a cut/paste error: P107 should be P1076. Here is the correct link:
Regards.
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 17:19:18 +0100, Brent Hayhoe <Brent.Hayhoe@Aftonroy.com> wrote:
Following the meetings discussing interfaces and Ernst's excellent white paper
detailing initial requirements, I've set up some 'whiteboard' pages in order to
provide a brainstorming mechanism for the group.
If you can't get to the meetings then please add your suggestions, comments and
questions on these pages. The idea is to keep it free-form bullet points and/or
examples.
These will be reviewed via the WG meetings.
I've set up three pages initially:
http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/view.cgi/P107/HeterogeneousInterfaceRequirements This contains the requirements as detailed in Ernst's white paper.
Ernst, can you update this with the modifications we made at the last
meeting?
http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/view.cgi/P1076/InterfaceConcepts This is some bullet points and examples I put together regarding new mode
requirements for a simple CPU master/slave interface.
http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/view.cgi/P1076/InterfaceBundles Some bullet points on the new 'bundle' requirements for interfaces. This is the
first priority for the next meeting.
These areas can all be accessed from a new 'Whiteboards' link on the main P1076
web page.
The aim is for the WG meeting to condense these concepts and requirements into a
final proposal(s).
Regards,
Brent.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.