Re: [vhdl-200x] Modular types, alternative solutions

From: Jim Lewis <jim@synthworks.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 2014 - 11:51:29 PDT
Ray,
Oops.  I was not clear.  I was referring to "very few engineers/companies asked for VHDL2008 and hence the uptake was rather slow".

I agree, 64 bit integers is not a bug.  Asking for them is not non-compliant with the LRM, however larger than 32 bit would potentially be non-portable.  OTOH,

Jim
> And the answer from the vendor when asked to incorporate features not in the LRM is that such changes don't comply with the spec, so it isn't a bug, nor is it likely to be implements .  BTDT.
>
> On 10/29/2014 12:42 PM, Jim Lewis wrote:
>> If that is truely the case, then we have a perception issue. Engineers simply are not in the practice of having to ask a vendor to implement new features of a standard for which the vendor makes a 
>> product.   From an engineers perspective, having to do that is silly.
>>
>> So our job is to educate people that if they want the new language features, they have to make requests and file bug reports against the tools
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jim
>>
>
>

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jim Lewis                                  Jim@SynthWorks.com
VHDL Training Expert                       http://www.SynthWorks.com
IEEE VHDL Working Group Chair
OSVVM, Chief Architect and Cofounder
1-503-590-4787
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Oct 29 11:51:59 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 29 2014 - 11:52:36 PDT