Re: [vhdl-200x] Modular types, alternative solutions

From: Ray Andraka, Andraka Consulting Group, Inc <ray@andraka.com>
Date: Wed Oct 29 2014 - 10:03:00 PDT
And the answer from the vendor when asked to incorporate features not in 
the LRM is that such changes don't comply with the spec, so it isn't a 
bug, nor is it likely to be implements .  BTDT.

On 10/29/2014 12:42 PM, Jim Lewis wrote:
> If that is truely the case, then we have a perception issue. Engineers 
> simply are not in the practice of having to ask a vendor to implement 
> new features of a standard for which the vendor makes a product.   
> From an engineers perspective, having to do that is silly.
>
> So our job is to educate people that if they want the new language 
> features, they have to make requests and file bug reports against the 
> tools
>
> Cheers,
> Jim
>


-- 
--Ray Andraka, P.E.
President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc.
401/884-7930     Fax 401/884-7950
email ray@andraka.com
http://www.andraka.com

   "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little
    temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                                            -Benjamin Franklin, 1759
  


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Oct 29 10:03:25 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 29 2014 - 10:03:40 PDT