Sorry, yes this proposal is for STD.STANDARD.INTEGER. Cheers, Martin -----Original Message----- From: owner-vhdl-200x@eda.org [mailto:owner-vhdl-200x@eda.org] On Behalf Of tgingold@free.fr Sent: 22 October 2014 10:47 To: vhdl-200x@eda.org Subject: {Spam?} Re: {Spam?} Re: [vhdl-200x] More operators for integers > Thanks Tristan, I'll add your comments to the Twiki page. Should I > put your name in the Opposers list (yet? :) Yes, currently I am an opposer (for technical reasons). > Just one note on the range of integers - the proposal is that the > standard now *does* define the range of an integer. In past > discussions we have rejected changing the range of INTEGER as too much > past code may be (non-portably, but still...) dependent on it. You want the standard to specify the range of every integer type ? I think this is a no-go. You haven't clarify wether this proposal is for STD.STANDARD.INTEGER type or for any integer types. I think this is an important point. Regards, Tristan. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Oct 22 03:02:43 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 22 2014 - 03:03:05 PDT