{Spam?} Re: [vhdl-200x] RE: {Spam?} Re: [vhdl-200x] More operators for integers

From: <tgingold@free.fr>
Date: Wed Oct 22 2014 - 02:49:52 PDT
> In a sense, using the modular type shields us from having to deal
> with
> these standards grey areas. And this would automatically adjust every
> result
> of a bool/shift operation, preventing coding mistakes and keeping the
> source code easy to read.

Yes.

> However, bool/shift are also desirable for integers, as I've
> illustrated
> in my last message. Having both would allow the coders to choose the
> type that best suits their needs for each case.

Can you clarify this point ?  I haven't seen in your last message
why this is desirable for integers.  Maybe I haven't read the good
last one :-(

I think your main need for logical operators on integer types is a
speed need.  But then, it would be much better to ask vendors to
optimize numeric_bit.  After all, they are very close to modular
types.

Tristan.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Oct 22 02:50:25 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 22 2014 - 02:50:27 PDT