> Thanks Tristan, I'll add your comments to the Twiki page. Should I > put your name in the Opposers list (yet? :) Yes, currently I am an opposer (for technical reasons). > Just one note on the range of integers - the proposal is that the > standard now *does* define the range of an integer. In past > discussions we have rejected changing the range of INTEGER as too > much past code may be (non-portably, but still...) dependent on it. You want the standard to specify the range of every integer type ? I think this is a no-go. You haven't clarify wether this proposal is for STD.STANDARD.INTEGER type or for any integer types. I think this is an important point. Regards, Tristan. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Oct 22 02:47:45 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 22 2014 - 02:48:06 PDT