Hi Andy, > . . . It is a small price to pay, IMHO, for avoiding the aches > and pains of maintaining configuration(s). Eventually you have to specify the generics somewhere. I am guessing that you favor using command line switches in the simulator? What makes maintaining what you are using easier than maintaining configurations - with the thought of can anything be done to make maintaining configurations as easy as maintaining the simulation scripts. Perhaps then your reasoning supports the use of an architecture name as a generic - to simplify the whole selection process. Best, Jim -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jim Lewis Director of Training mailto:Jim@SynthWorks.com SynthWorks Design Inc. http://www.SynthWorks.com 1-503-590-4787 Expert VHDL Training for Hardware Design and Verification ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Feb 4 13:31:39 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 04 2013 - 13:32:18 PST