RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing
Subject: RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing
From: Scott Thibault (thibault@gmvhdl.com)
Date: Fri Dec 19 2003 - 07:04:30 PST
- Next message: Bailey, Stephen: "RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g"
- Previous message: Gabe Moretti: "Re: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing"
- In reply to: Jay Lawrence: "RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing"
- Next in thread: Gabe Moretti: "Re: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing"
- Next in thread: Jay Lawrence: "RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing"
- Next in thread: Hamish Moffatt: "Re: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion"
- Reply: Scott Thibault: "RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing"
- Reply: Gabe Moretti: "Re: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
>
> I think that in VHDL in general this does not save significant typing
> and does not add much value, however when you consider PSL assertions
>
I don't think typing is the real benefit here. I don't think I have ever
mistakenly typed:
if (we = '0') then
or
if (we_n = '1') then
However, I have many many times typed:
if (we) then
The result being that when I finally compile the design, I'm met with a long
list of compiler errors. This is frustrating and reduces productivity.
--Scott Thibault
Green Mountain
Computing Systems, Inc.
http://www.gmvhdl.com
- Next message: Bailey, Stephen: "RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g"
- Previous message: Gabe Moretti: "Re: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing"
- In reply to: Jay Lawrence: "RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing"
- Next in thread: Gabe Moretti: "Re: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing"
- Next in thread: Jay Lawrence: "RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing"
- Next in thread: Hamish Moffatt: "Re: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion"
- Reply: Scott Thibault: "RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing"
- Reply: Gabe Moretti: "Re: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typing"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28
: Fri Dec 19 2003 - 07:06:58 PST