Folks,
Looks like we've come full circle! I concur.
Cheers,
PA
-- Dr. Peter J. Ashenden peter@ashenden.com.au Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd. www.ashenden.com.au PO Box 640 Ph: +61 8 8339 7532 Stirling, SA 5152 Fax: +61 8 8339 2616 Australia Mobile: +61 414 70 9106 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org > [mailto:owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org] On Behalf Of David Bishop > Sent: Tuesday, 5 October 2004 23:43 > To: vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org > Subject: [vhdl-200x-ft] Ft19 process_comb > > > Came up with an interesting solution to our discussion last night. > > How does this sound: > > process (all) is > a <= b and c; > end process; > > Simply state that if keyword "all" (which is already a > reserved word) appears in the sensitivity list then all of > the inputs to that process will appear on the sensitivity list. > > I think that this is a much more generic solution than > "process_comb". Also with the discussions last night around > "process_latch" and "process_ff" I think that they should > probably be dropped in this round. > > -- > David W. Bishop dbishop@vhdl.org All standard disclaimers apply. >Received on Tue Oct 5 21:58:46 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 05 2004 - 21:58:56 PDT