RE: [vhdl-200x-ft] Ft19 process_comb

From: Peter Ashenden <peter@ashenden.com.au>
Date: Tue Oct 05 2004 - 21:58:57 PDT

Folks,

Looks like we've come full circle! I concur.

Cheers,

PA

--
Dr. Peter J. Ashenden                        peter@ashenden.com.au
Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd.                   www.ashenden.com.au
PO Box 640                                   Ph:  +61 8 8339 7532
Stirling, SA 5152                            Fax: +61 8 8339 2616
Australia                                    Mobile: +61 414 70 9106
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org] On Behalf Of David Bishop
> Sent: Tuesday, 5 October 2004 23:43
> To: vhdl-200x-ft@eda.org
> Subject: [vhdl-200x-ft] Ft19 process_comb
> 
> 
> Came up with an interesting solution to our discussion last night.
> 
> How does this sound:
> 
> process (all) is
>    a <= b and c;
> end process;
> 
> Simply state that if keyword "all" (which is already a 
> reserved word) appears in the sensitivity list then all of 
> the inputs to that process will appear on the sensitivity list.
> 
> I think that this is a much more generic solution than 
> "process_comb". Also with the discussions last night around 
> "process_latch" and "process_ff" I think that they should 
> probably be dropped in this round.
> 
> -- 
> David W. Bishop dbishop@vhdl.org       All standard disclaimers apply.
> 
Received on Tue Oct 5 21:58:46 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 05 2004 - 21:58:56 PDT