At 08:08 AM 10/5/2004, Ries, John wrote:
>I agree. It gets around a lot of the problems of defining what
>is combinational and what is flip-flop.
>
>Regards,
> John
>
>David Bishop wrote:
> > Came up with an interesting solution to our discussion last night.
> >
> > How does this sound:
> >
> > process (all) is
> > a <= b and c;
> > end process;
> >
> > Simply state that if keyword "all" (which is already a reserved word)
> > appears in the sensitivity list then all of the inputs to that process
> > will appear on the sensitivity list.
David,
I like it.. very good idea
-tim
Received on Tue Oct 5 12:38:52 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 05 2004 - 12:39:01 PDT