Re: [vhdl-200x-ft] Ft19 process_comb

I agree. It gets around a lot of the problems of defining what
is combinational and what is flip-flop.

Regards,
   John

David Bishop wrote:
> Came up with an interesting solution to our discussion last night.
>
> How does this sound:
>
> process (all) is
> a <= b and c;
> end process;
>
> Simply state that if keyword "all" (which is already a reserved word)
> appears in the sensitivity list then all of the inputs to that process
> will appear on the sensitivity list.
>
> I think that this is a much more generic solution than "process_comb".
> Also with the discussions last night around "process_latch" and
> "process_ff" I think that they should probably be dropped in this
> round.
>
> --
> David W. Bishop dbishop@vhdl.org All standard disclaimers apply.
>

-- 
-- mailto: johnr@model.com     phone: (503)685-0864
--   http://www.model.com        fax: (503)685-0921
--