Re: [vhdl-200x-ft] Ft19 process_comb

I think somebody had proposed this earlier also, though
I can't remember why we went back to "process_comb". To
me, this looks the cleanest syntax for providing sensitivity
to all signals read by a process.

I also support your suggestion that we drop latch and ff processes
from this revision. I never really liked the idea of introducing
new kinds of processes or primitives into the language for modeling
FF or latch functionality - it somehow goes against the VHDL
tradition of simply providing the required language mechanisms and
leaving it to users to define behavior.

-ajay

----- Begin Included Message -----
Received on Wed Oct 6 01:26:34 2004