Hi all, After the discussions in the last telecon, I have updated the Arbitrary Integers page: http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/view.cgi/P1076/ArbitraryIntegers In summary, the proposal is to * Expose universal_integer as a completely unconstrained integer type, (and possibly make INTEGER a constrained subtype of this. Each tool will constrain the INTEGER to the range it currently provides for backwards compatibility.) * Create universal_integer'high and 'low * Allow logical and shift operations on universal_integers * Question: should conversions between UNIVERSAL_INTEGER and INTEGER be implicit or explicit? Any comments you have will be gratefully received as always :) Thanks, Martin -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Oct 10 04:08:25 2014
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 10 2014 - 04:08:45 PDT