[vhdl-200x] Clocked Shorthand Proposal - Need Consensus

Hello,
For the ClockedShorthand<http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/view.cgi/P1076/ClockedShorthand>proposal,
it seems that Syntax 1 was generally accepted by most people
during previous discussions.

However, Syntax 1 proposed two different syntaxes which serve the same
purpose:
Syntax 1a:
q <= d @ 2;

Syntax 1b:
q <= d after 2;

where '2' indicates the number of cycles to delay d before effectively
driving q.

I would like to seek your comments on which of the two syntaxes is more
favourable, and why?

Or does anyone think that both syntaxes should be supported?

regards, daniel

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.