[vhdl-200x] Clocked Shorthand Proposal - Need Consensus

From: Daniel Kho <daniel.kho@tauhop.com>
Date: Thu Mar 27 2014 - 10:44:46 PDT
For the ClockedShorthand<http://www.eda-twiki.org/cgi-bin/view.cgi/P1076/ClockedShorthand>proposal,
it seems that Syntax 1 was generally accepted by most people
during previous discussions.

However, Syntax 1 proposed two different syntaxes which serve the same
Syntax 1a:
q <= d @ 2;

Syntax 1b:
q <= d after 2;

where '2' indicates the number of cycles to delay d before effectively
driving q.

I would like to seek your comments on which of the two syntaxes is more
favourable, and why?

Or does anyone think that both syntaxes should be supported?

regards, daniel

This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Mar 27 10:45:36 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 27 2014 - 10:46:11 PDT