Hi Kevin,
Good point. In the last meeting we worked through the current
proposed requirements and assigned them to proposal owners for the work.
It would be a good idea to work through the bugzilla list next.
BTW, the best way to make sure that the work you are interested in
gets done is to attend the meetings and write or help write the
proposals for the work. As a result, it would be a good idea to
attend and/or write a proposal for the work you requested.
Best Regards,
Jim
> Prior to this group's existence there were other sites for proposing suggestions and bug reports. I don't see any record in this group of those suggestions being carried forward to the 'P1076 Collected Requirement' page of the Twiki (other than to 'submit an enhancement request or a bug' link), so my fear is that the suggestions will get lost yet again.
>
> Are the current Bugzilla reports considered to be part of the collected requirements for the new standard or not?
>
> In case the Bugzilla database suggestions are not in general being carried forward as new requirements for P1076 then, for my particular two cents, I'll re-propose my two suggestions from those earlier days again.
>
> Suggestion #1: Allow for individual elements of a vector to be left open on a port map. See this link for more information, this is the last site I posted the suggestion to along with the use case. https://bugzilla.mentor.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275
>
> Suggestion #2: Method to allow functions that return arrays to have knowledge of the array bounds. See this link for more information on the suggestion along with the use case. https://bugzilla.mentor.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240
>
> Kevin Jennings
>
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jim Lewis Director of Training mailto:Jim@SynthWorks.com SynthWorks Design Inc. http://www.SynthWorks.com 1-503-590-4787 Expert VHDL Training for Hardware Design and Verification ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Aug 16 20:55:49 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 16 2011 - 20:55:50 PDT