Re: [vhdl-200x] Fwd: IEEE Attorney response to "Can P1076 WG discuss external survey results?"

Jim Lewis <Jim@SynthWorks.com> sent on May 4th, 2011:
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|"[..] |
| |
|With this I withdraw my objection to the discussion. |
| |
|I apologize if I offended anyone. As chair, |
|I am responsible to make sure IEEE rules are followed. |
|With legal rules like this, it is not always about the |
|exact wording that someone uses, but their intent of |
|the wording. What they have said at this point gives |
|me a fairly good idea of their intent, so I don't expect|
|further issues in the future." |
|--------------------------------------------------------|

Hi Jim:

We all appreciate the great work you are doing. You were doing your
best in good faith, and no one can blame you for that.

|--------------------------------------------------------|
|"If you want to tell me I told you so, please do it |
|privately as I don't think the reflector needs that |
|kind of traffic volume. :) |
| |
|[..]" |
|--------------------------------------------------------|

I did not tell you so :)

With best regards,
Paul Colin Gloster

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.