Hi John,
> The previous working group for VHDL was
> entity based either, not that it matters
> right now.
Reading the text, I am sure you meant,
"not entity based either", as that is how the
previous IEEE working group was organized.
In the event anyone would like to reference the
previous par, it can be found here:
http://www.eda-twiki.org/vasg/p1076_2008_approved_par.pdf
We also did technical work under Accellera
and they are entity based, however, their rules
allow participation by non-voting members.
IEEE rules do not.
Best,
Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vhdl@lists.accellera.org [mailto:vhdl@lists.accellera.org] On
> Behalf Of Jim Lewis
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 7:26 AM
> To: Bresticker, Shalom
> Cc: vhdl-200x@eda.org; DASC; Accellera VHDL Extensions; Accellera VHDL
> TC; vhdl-lrm; isac@server.eda.org
> Subject: Re: [Accellera:vhdl] VHDL Study Group Meeting Reminder and
> Details
>
> Hi Shalom,
> The rules you reference are the current rules as of
> December 2009. Details are in the reference
> I included in 5.2.1.2 below.
>
> Since we have formed after 2009, we will have to be
> compliant with these rules. I think some of the
> working groups that were active during the change
> were allowed to continue with the previous rules
> for some amount of time.
>
> Best,
> Jim
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jim Lewis Director of Training mailto:Jim@SynthWorks.com SynthWorks Design Inc. http://www.SynthWorks.com 1-503-590-4787 Expert VHDL Training for Hardware Design and Verification ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Nov 30 20:36:17 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 30 2010 - 20:36:38 PST