> Hans wrote:
> ...
> I am sure we all agree that VHDL requires some work in TLM/CR/OO,
> perhaps some less obvious suggestions:
>
Hi Lance,
I agree I think it is time that vacation is over.
Do you think that Accellera board would approve us to work on
verification enhancements (TLM/CR/OO and Functional Coverage)
to VHDL?
If we decide to go this route, Accellera would need another
MOU from IEEE VASG since the last one was only for the
VHDL-200X version and we have already finished that.
I think before we consider another MOU, we need to
find out if Accellera board and the working group
would approve verification enhancements.
Is everyone still a member of Accellera? It seems expensive
to join Accellera just to support VHDL.
Best,
Jim
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Feb 23 07:21:51 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 23 2010 - 07:27:06 PST