RE: [vhdl-200x] Call for Vote on ISAC Issues 1000, 2111, 2115, 2116

Folks,

Further to the call for votes: A few participants in the WG appear to have
overlooked voting in the last couple of rounds and have fallen below the "2
out of last 3" threshold for maintaining voting eligibility. Please send me
your vote for the current round, so that you can keep above threshold. You
can send me an abstain vote if you don't have time to go over the issues in
detail. Thanks.

Cheers,

PA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-vhdl-200x@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-vhdl-200x@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Peter Ashenden
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 October 2007 13:07 PM
> To: vhdl-200x@server.eda.org
> Subject: [vhdl-200x] Call for Vote on ISAC Issues 1000, 2111, 
> 2115, 2116
> 
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> This is a call for vote from IEEE P1076 WG members on the 
> next group of ISAC issues listed below.  The ISAC has 
> analyzed the issues and made recommendations for 
> interpretation of the IEEE 1076-2002 standard and for future 
> revisions of the standard.  This vote is for approval of the 
> ISAC recommendations.
> 
> Please note that, in some cases, a recommendation may be to 
> reject a request.  In that case, a vote to approve the 
> recommendation means rejecting the request, whereas a 
> negative vote means reconsidering the request. Please take 
> care with the logical sense of your vote in such cases.
> 
> Also note that some of the issues do not specify detailed LRM 
> edits to implement a change.  The intention is that the 
> detailed changes be specified in a Language Change 
> Specification (LCS) document that will be voted on 
> separately.  The intent of this vote is to determine whether 
> such an LCS is required.
> 
> Only votes of eligible voters will be counted.  Votes from 
> ineligible voters will be recorded for information and for 
> adding to your "last 2 or 3" participation count.  I will 
> acknowledge each vote received and indicate whether it was 
> counted or not.
> 
> Please forward votes to me by email (eg, by replying to this 
> message) by 5pm US-PDT, Wednesday October 17, 2007.
> 
> For each issue, would you please vote one of: approve, 
> negative with comments, negative with no comments, or 
> abstain.  You may also provide informative comments with a 
> vote to approve a recommendation.  Please use the form below. 
>  Thank you.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Peter Ashenden
> P1076 Secretary
> 
> 
> 
> Issue      Approve       Negative       Negative      Abstain
>                           with comment   no comment
> 
> 1000	Accumulated typographical and terminology errors.
> http://www.eda-twiki.org/isac/IRs-VHDL-2002/IR1000.txt
> 1000       ____          ____            ____         ____
> 
>             Comment:
> 
> 
> 2111	Unknown term used:  selector
> http://www.eda-twiki.org/isac/IRs-VHDL-2002/IR2111.txt
> 2111       ____          ____            ____         ____
> 
>             Comment:
> 
> 
> 2115	Binding specification should be binding indication
> http://www.eda-twiki.org/isac/IRs-VHDL-2002/IR2115.txt
> 2115       ____          ____            ____         ____
> 
>             Comment:
> 
> 
> 2116	What is the direction of std_logic_vector & '0'
> http://www.eda-twiki.org/isac/IRs-VHDL-2002/IR2116.txt
> 2116       ____          ____            ____         ____
> 
>             Comment:
> 
> 
> --
> Dr. Peter J. Ashenden         peter@ashenden.com.au
> Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd.    www.ashenden.com.au
> PO Box 640                    VoIP: 
> sip://0871270078@sip.internode.on.net
> Stirling, SA 5152             Phone: +61 8 7127 0078
> Australia                     Mobile: +61 414 70 9106
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.