RE: [vhdl-200x] Call for Vote on WG Policies & Procedures

Hi Mac and all,

If there are no objections, I will terminate the current P&Ps vote as it is clear a bit more discussion was needed, update the P&Ps as per Peter's and Mac's comments and then restart the vote with the updated/"instantiated" WG P&Ps.

I think this will be cleaner and will help to ensure that people are satisfied that there is no confusion between what was conditionally approved and what actually becomes our P&Ps.

Also, it is worth considering if we wish to specifically allow individual voting within sub-groups (committees) of the WG in the P&Ps (see Peter's email) in order to cover all possible outcomes WRT WG membership in the PAR. I will investigate that aspect before sending out the revised, draft WG P&Ps for a vote.

Of course, continued discussion on the P&Ps is encouraged as I'm sure I won't be able to get the revision out until next week sometime and it isn't efficient to repeatedly starting/stopping a vote.

Thanks,

-Steve Bailey

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael McNamara [mailto:mac@verisity.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 4:23 PM
> To: Bailey, Stephen
> Cc: vhdl-200x@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [vhdl-200x] Call for Vote on WG Policies & Procedures
>
>
> I move
>
> 1) that we insert VHDL-200x P1076 as the name of the working group in
> the title;
> 2) That we insert or current Scope in the Working Group Scope
> of section of the Introduction;
> 3) that we remove the treasurer position from section 3 and 4.5;
> 4) that we set the required notice for meetings to be 30 days.
> 5) that we renumber the items in section 6.5 to be 1,3,2&4
> rather than 1,1,2&3
>
> If these are accepted, I vote in favor of adoption of the
> Policys and Procedures.
>
>
> -- On Jun 17 2004 at 11:44, Bailey, Stephen sent a message:
> > To: vhdl-200x@eda.org
> > Subject: "[vhdl-200x] Call for Vote on WG Policies & Procedures"
> > I had previously pointed to the DASC model WG policies and
> procedures and opened discussion on their suitability for
> adoption as the 1076 (VHDL-200x) working group's P&Ps. To
> date, there has been no discussion on this topic. Therefore,
> I will presume a motion to adopt the DASC model WG P&Ps.
> >
> > Please note that, according to the P&Ps, voting membership
> requires participation and, working on the assumption that
> this vote will pass, I will begin documenting participation
> with this vote. (See section 4.7.1 of the CS SAB P&Ps
> http://www.computer.org/standards/ORIENT/p%26ptoc.htm
> <http://www.computer.org/standards/ORIENT/p%26ptoc.htm> as
> referenced in section 4.1 of the model WG P&Ps.) > > The WG
> Roster at
> http://www.eda-twiki.org/vhdl-200x/1076_wg_roster_summary.htm
> <http://www.eda-twiki.org/vhdl-200x/1076_wg_roster_summary.htm> is
> accurate with one exception (John Aynsley is now a voting
> member) which should be fixed on the web page later today.
> >
> > Suspense date for submitting a vote is Friday, 2 July
> 2004. The motion being put to a vote of the WG:
> >
> > Shall the P1076 (VHDL-200x) working group adopt the DASC
> model WG Policies and Procedures as the P&Ps of the working group?
> >
> > ____ Approve (comments are optional)
> >
> > ____ Disapprove (explanation, please) > > ____ Abstain
> > > ------------ > Stephen Bailey > ModelSim Verification
> TME > Mentor Graphics > sbailey@model.com > 303-775-1655
> (mobile, preferred) > 720-494-1202 (office) > www.model.com
> <www.model.com>
>
Received on Fri Jun 18 16:04:16 2004