Hi Jay,
Jay Lawrence writes:
> Because I'm basically lazy and google is faster than my math, I found
> the following
>
> http://www.geocities.com/herong_yang/data/uuencode.html
>
> It contains a table of the printable range in uuencoded text and you are
> correct it does not contain lower case letters. The example should
> probably be updated to have actual encrypted/encoded text.
Do you know whether BASE64 was considered as encoding scheme and
whether uuencode was preferred?
BASE64 is well standardized and generally used in MIME email
(http://www.mhonarc.org/~ehood/MIME/2045/rfc2045.html#6.8) to encode
binary data. There are plenty of codecs floating around.
I remember reading this in the mmencode(1) man-page:
RATIONALE
Mimencode is intended to be a replacement for uuencode for mail
and news use. The reason is simple: uuencode doesn't work very
well in a number of circumstances and ways. In particular,
uuencode uses characters that don't translate well across all mail
gateways (particularly ASCII <-> EBCDIC gateways). Also, uuencode
is not standard -- there are several variants floating around,
encoding and decoding things in different and incompatible ways,
with no "standard" on which to base an implementation. [...]
Best regards,
Marcus
-- Marcus Harnisch | Mint Technology, a division of LSI Logic marcus_harnisch@mint-tech.com | 200 West Street, Waltham, MA 02431 Tel: +1-781-768-0772 | http://www.lsilogic.comReceived on Thu May 20 09:49:10 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 20 2004 - 09:49:36 PDT