RE: [vhdl-200x] DeMorgan equiv logic operators


Subject: RE: [vhdl-200x] DeMorgan equiv logic operators
From: Bailey, Stephen (SBailey@model.com)
Date: Tue Dec 23 2003 - 14:45:29 PST


Tim,

I believe this is the first request for such operators. Based on your previous email, I believe all that is necessary is to negate the inputs and then do the logical operation. (Sorry, it has been too many years since my boolean algebra days and too long on the language side. I want to make sure I don't get the intended functionality wrong.)

As we are looking at providing unary reduction operators, are there DeMorgan equivalents for unary reduction context?

I assume the precedence would be the same as for the existing binary logic operators. Let me know if it should be different.

Stuff like this is relatively simple to add to the language and I don't see any problems in doing so. I just want to make sure the functionality, precedence, etc. are correct.

-Steve Bailey

> So, when do we get the DeMorgan equiv operators in the language? I
> propose AND_N, OR_N, NAND_N and NOR_N.
> --
> Aspen Logic, Inc.
> By: Tim Davis, President
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Dec 23 2003 - 14:46:53 PST