Re: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g

Subject: Re: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g
From: Hamish Moffatt (hamish_moffatt@agilent.com)
Date: Fri Dec 19 2003 - 15:30:03 PST

• Next message: Jim Lewis: "Re: [vhdl-200x] VHDL is Domain Non-specific. Verilog is domain specific"
• Previous message: Tim Davis: "[vhdl-200x] VHDL is Domain Non-specific. Verilog is domain specific"
• In reply to: Bailey, Stephen: "RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g"
• Next in thread: Bailey, Stephen: "RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g"
• Reply: Hamish Moffatt: "Re: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bailey, Stephen wrote:
> - Do nothing to address an enhancement request that is elevated in
> priority due to the desire to incorporate PSL as the property
> specification capability in VHDL. (I already pointed out the obvious
> language inconsistencies that arise if we do nothing.)

Why is the COND operator required for PSL?

Hamish

• Next message: Jim Lewis: "Re: [vhdl-200x] VHDL is Domain Non-specific. Verilog is domain specific"
• Previous message: Tim Davis: "[vhdl-200x] VHDL is Domain Non-specific. Verilog is domain specific"
• In reply to: Bailey, Stephen: "RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g"
• Next in thread: Bailey, Stephen: "RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g"
• Reply: Hamish Moffatt: "Re: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Dec 19 2003 - 15:31:25 PST