RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g

Subject: RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g
From: Bailey, Stephen (SBailey@model.com)
Date: Fri Dec 19 2003 - 09:14:34 PST

Pardon the hyperbole in my recent statement:

> It is not, by any stretch of the imagination, invisible.

Please read this as if I said:

When using the LRM terminology accurately and precisely, it is not invisible.

(I can see how casual use of terminology that the LRM uses precisely and accurately can lead to the use of the term invisible. It helps greatly in the discussion to use terminology consistent with the LRM's use.)

-Steve Bailey

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Dec 19 2003 - 09:16:42 PST