RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g

Subject: RE: [vhdl-200x] Implicit conversion, Overloading, & Strong Typin g
From: Bailey, Stephen (SBailey@model.com)
Date: Fri Dec 19 2003 - 09:54:09 PST

> BTW, I think you made the point elsewhere (I'm losing track!) that the
> objection to the proposal was a readability and understandability
> objection. My objection, and various other people have made the same
> point, is that it compromises type safety.

I acknowledge that and was mentally including it within the scope of maintainability.

-Steve Bailey

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Dec 19 2003 - 09:55:38 PST