Re: [sv-champions] Email vote ending August 1, 2011 - extended to the 5th

Reminder,

The email vote will expire this Friday.

Neil

On 07/26/11 18:22, Neil Korpusik wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am extending the deadline for this email vote to Friday August 5th.
>
> Neil
>
>
>
>
>
> On 07/23/11 19:34, Neil Korpusik wrote:
>> P1800 Champions,
>>
>> We are conducting an email vote for mantis items that are in the resolved
>> state. There are 15 mantis items ready for the Champions. I have put all
>> 15 into this email vote. All of these mantis items have proposals,
>> some are
>> quite small and others are large.
>>
>> Mark your votes as being either Approve or Oppose. If you Oppose, please
>> specify a reason. You have until August 1, midnight (PST) to cast
>> your votes.
>>
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> P1800 Champions,
>>
>> We are conducting an email vote for mantis items that are in the
>> resolved state. There are 15 mantis items ready for the Champions. I
>> have put all 15 into this email vote. All of these mantis items have
>> proposals, some are quite small and others are large.
>>
>> Mark your votes as being either Approve or Oppose. If you Oppose,
>> please specify a reason. You have until August 1, midnight (PST) to
>> cast your votes.
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
>> 1. 2476 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2476> SV-AC Need
>> clarification about system functions $onehot, etc
>> There is a proposal (7 pages)
>> The proposal was opposed by the Champion's in the email vote which
>> ended on April 8th, 2011. The proposal was updated based on the
>> Champion's feedback. The updated proposal seems to work-around the
>> problem that Dave saw with 1'b1 versus 2'01.
>> The amended proposal passed by voice vote 2011-07-19: 10y/0n/0a.
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 2. 3113 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3113> SV-AC Add
>> port_identifier to constant_primary BNF for sequences, properties
>> and checkers
>> There is a proposal (6 pages with several small changes).
>> The proposal was opposed by the Champion's twice. This is the
>> third time it has gone to the Champion's. There was only one
>> objection from the most recent review.
>> The amended proposal was approved by email ballot 2011-07-18:
>> 10y/0n/0a.
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 3. 3015 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3015> SV-AC Examples of
>> $fatal have bad arguments
>> There is a proposal (1 page)
>> This is the first time this short proposal has gone to the
>> Champion's.
>> Passed by voice vote 2011-07-19: 10y/0n/0a.
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 4. 3459 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3459> SV-CC DPI section
>> "H.6.6 Pure functions" is redundant and should be removed
>> There is a proposal (2 pages) - deletes a sub-clause.
>> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
>> On Apr-27-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 5. 3272 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3272> SV-CC two
>> cross-references are not hyperlinked
>> There is a proposal (3 pages).
>> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
>> On May-11-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 6. 3522 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3522> SV-CC
>> vpiStringConst, not vpiStringVal, as possible value of vpiConstType
>> There is a proposal (with a one word change).
>> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
>> On May-11-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 7. 3118 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3118> SV-CC Typo in
>> H.7.7 Canonical representation of packed arrays
>> There is a proposal (with a one word change).
>> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
>> On Jun-08-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 8. 1352 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=1352> SV-CC VPI 27.37
>> "Multiclock sequence expression" error
>> There is a proposal (deletes one diagram and updates another)
>> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
>> On Jun-08-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 9. 3599 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3599> SV-CC svBitVecVal
>> as reference type is missing asterisk
>> There is a proposal (changes the font for one word and adds an *).
>> I found it very difficult to locate this update. It seems to me
>> that the Editor may miss it.
>> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
>> On Jun-22-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 10. 3385 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3385> SV-AC Possible
>> ambiguity when deferred assertion action block calls nested
>> function
>> There is a proposal (2 pages) that adds new text.
>> This is the second time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
>> Passed by voice vote 2011-07-12: 10y/0n/0a.
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 11. 2412 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2412> SV-AC Allow clock
>> inference in sequences
>> There is a proposal (5 pages)
>> This is the 4th time this proposal has gone to the Champions.
>> The amended proposal was approved by e-mail ballot on 6/28/2011:
>> 8y/0n/0a
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 12. 3069 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3069> SV-AC Relax rules
>> for $global_clock resolution
>> There is a proposal (6 pages)
>> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
>> The proposal was approved by the SV-AC on 6/21/2011 6y, 0n, 0a
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 13. 2794 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2794> SV-EC Clarify
>> queue methods return status
>> There is a proposal (2 pages)
>> The champion's feedback of September 29th was addressed.
>> Proposal 2794-3a was unanimously approved by the sv-ec in the
>> conference call held on July 18, 2011.
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 14. 2112 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2112> SV-EC Remove
>> restrictions on NBA assignments to class members
>> There is a proposal (2 pages)
>> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
>> Version 4 of the proposal (2112 NBA v4) was unanimously approved
>> by the sv-ec in the conference call held on July 18, 2011.
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>>
>> 15. 2900 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2900> SV-EC Associative
>> array should consider the context of an lvalue to create an entry
>> There is a proposal (1 page)
>> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
>> Version 4 of the proposal (2900 assoc lvalue v4) was unanimously
>> approved by the sv-ec in the conference call held on July 18, 2011.
>>
>> Approve __ Oppose __
>>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.