Re: [sv-champions] Email vote ending August 1, 2011 - extended to the 5th

Hi All,

I am extending the deadline for this email vote to Friday August 5th.

Neil

On 07/23/11 19:34, Neil Korpusik wrote:
> P1800 Champions,
>
> We are conducting an email vote for mantis items that are in the resolved
> state. There are 15 mantis items ready for the Champions. I have put all
> 15 into this email vote. All of these mantis items have proposals, some are
> quite small and others are large.
>
> Mark your votes as being either Approve or Oppose. If you Oppose, please
> specify a reason. You have until August 1, midnight (PST) to cast your
> votes.
>
>
> Neil
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> P1800 Champions,
>
> We are conducting an email vote for mantis items that are in the
> resolved state. There are 15 mantis items ready for the Champions. I
> have put all 15 into this email vote. All of these mantis items have
> proposals, some are quite small and others are large.
>
> Mark your votes as being either Approve or Oppose. If you Oppose, please
> specify a reason. You have until August 1, midnight (PST) to cast your
> votes.
>
> Neil
>
>
> 1. 2476 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2476> SV-AC Need
> clarification about system functions $onehot, etc
> There is a proposal (7 pages)
> The proposal was opposed by the Champion's in the email vote which
> ended on April 8th, 2011. The proposal was updated based on the
> Champion's feedback. The updated proposal seems to work-around the
> problem that Dave saw with 1'b1 versus 2'01.
> The amended proposal passed by voice vote 2011-07-19: 10y/0n/0a.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 2. 3113 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3113> SV-AC Add
> port_identifier to constant_primary BNF for sequences, properties
> and checkers
> There is a proposal (6 pages with several small changes).
> The proposal was opposed by the Champion's twice. This is the
> third time it has gone to the Champion's. There was only one
> objection from the most recent review.
> The amended proposal was approved by email ballot 2011-07-18:
> 10y/0n/0a.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 3. 3015 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3015> SV-AC Examples of
> $fatal have bad arguments
> There is a proposal (1 page)
> This is the first time this short proposal has gone to the
> Champion's.
> Passed by voice vote 2011-07-19: 10y/0n/0a.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 4. 3459 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3459> SV-CC DPI section
> "H.6.6 Pure functions" is redundant and should be removed
> There is a proposal (2 pages) - deletes a sub-clause.
> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> On Apr-27-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 5. 3272 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3272> SV-CC two
> cross-references are not hyperlinked
> There is a proposal (3 pages).
> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> On May-11-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 6. 3522 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3522> SV-CC
> vpiStringConst, not vpiStringVal, as possible value of vpiConstType
> There is a proposal (with a one word change).
> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> On May-11-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 7. 3118 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3118> SV-CC Typo in
> H.7.7 Canonical representation of packed arrays
> There is a proposal (with a one word change).
> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> On Jun-08-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 8. 1352 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=1352> SV-CC VPI 27.37
> "Multiclock sequence expression" error
> There is a proposal (deletes one diagram and updates another)
> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> On Jun-08-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 9. 3599 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3599> SV-CC svBitVecVal
> as reference type is missing asterisk
> There is a proposal (changes the font for one word and adds an *).
> I found it very difficult to locate this update. It seems to me
> that the Editor may miss it.
> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> On Jun-22-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 10. 3385 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3385> SV-AC Possible
> ambiguity when deferred assertion action block calls nested function
> There is a proposal (2 pages) that adds new text.
> This is the second time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> Passed by voice vote 2011-07-12: 10y/0n/0a.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 11. 2412 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2412> SV-AC Allow clock
> inference in sequences
> There is a proposal (5 pages)
> This is the 4th time this proposal has gone to the Champions.
> The amended proposal was approved by e-mail ballot on 6/28/2011:
> 8y/0n/0a
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 12. 3069 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3069> SV-AC Relax rules
> for $global_clock resolution
> There is a proposal (6 pages)
> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> The proposal was approved by the SV-AC on 6/21/2011 6y, 0n, 0a
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 13. 2794 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2794> SV-EC Clarify
> queue methods return status
> There is a proposal (2 pages)
> The champion's feedback of September 29th was addressed.
> Proposal 2794-3a was unanimously approved by the sv-ec in the
> conference call held on July 18, 2011.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 14. 2112 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2112> SV-EC Remove
> restrictions on NBA assignments to class members
> There is a proposal (2 pages)
> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> Version 4 of the proposal (2112 NBA v4) was unanimously approved
> by the sv-ec in the conference call held on July 18, 2011.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>
>
> 15. 2900 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2900> SV-EC Associative
> array should consider the context of an lvalue to create an entry
> There is a proposal (1 page)
> This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> Version 4 of the proposal (2900 assoc lvalue v4) was unanimously
> approved by the sv-ec in the conference call held on July 18, 2011.
>
> Approve __ Oppose __
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.