RE: [sv-champions] Email vote ending August 1, 2011 - extended to the 5th

Hi,

The proposals for 2112 (SV-EC) and 3113 (SV-AC) are missing title lines stating what Mantis they refer to.

Regards,
Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-champions@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-champions@eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Neil Korpusik
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 4:23 AM
> To: neil.korpusik@oracle.com
> Cc: sv-champions@eda.org
> Subject: Re: [sv-champions] Email vote ending August 1, 2011 - extended to
> the 5th
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am extending the deadline for this email vote to Friday August 5th.
>
> Neil
>
>
>
>
>
> On 07/23/11 19:34, Neil Korpusik wrote:
> > P1800 Champions,
> >
> > We are conducting an email vote for mantis items that are in the resolved
> > state. There are 15 mantis items ready for the Champions. I have put all
> > 15 into this email vote. All of these mantis items have proposals, some
> are
> > quite small and others are large.
> >
> > Mark your votes as being either Approve or Oppose. If you Oppose, please
> > specify a reason. You have until August 1, midnight (PST) to cast your
> > votes.
> >
> >
> > Neil
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > P1800 Champions,
> >
> > We are conducting an email vote for mantis items that are in the
> > resolved state. There are 15 mantis items ready for the Champions. I
> > have put all 15 into this email vote. All of these mantis items have
> > proposals, some are quite small and others are large.
> >
> > Mark your votes as being either Approve or Oppose. If you Oppose, please
> > specify a reason. You have until August 1, midnight (PST) to cast your
> > votes.
> >
> > Neil
> >
> >
> > 1. 2476 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2476> SV-AC Need
> > clarification about system functions $onehot, etc
> > There is a proposal (7 pages)
> > The proposal was opposed by the Champion's in the email vote which
> > ended on April 8th, 2011. The proposal was updated based on the
> > Champion's feedback. The updated proposal seems to work-around the
> > problem that Dave saw with 1'b1 versus 2'01.
> > The amended proposal passed by voice vote 2011-07-19: 10y/0n/0a.
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 2. 3113 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3113> SV-AC Add
> > port_identifier to constant_primary BNF for sequences, properties
> > and checkers
> > There is a proposal (6 pages with several small changes).
> > The proposal was opposed by the Champion's twice. This is the
> > third time it has gone to the Champion's. There was only one
> > objection from the most recent review.
> > The amended proposal was approved by email ballot 2011-07-18:
> > 10y/0n/0a.
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 3. 3015 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3015> SV-AC Examples of
> > $fatal have bad arguments
> > There is a proposal (1 page)
> > This is the first time this short proposal has gone to the
> > Champion's.
> > Passed by voice vote 2011-07-19: 10y/0n/0a.
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 4. 3459 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3459> SV-CC DPI section
> > "H.6.6 Pure functions" is redundant and should be removed
> > There is a proposal (2 pages) - deletes a sub-clause.
> > This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> > On Apr-27-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 5. 3272 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3272> SV-CC two
> > cross-references are not hyperlinked
> > There is a proposal (3 pages).
> > This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> > On May-11-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 6. 3522 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3522> SV-CC
> > vpiStringConst, not vpiStringVal, as possible value of vpiConstType
> > There is a proposal (with a one word change).
> > This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> > On May-11-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 7. 3118 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3118> SV-CC Typo in
> > H.7.7 Canonical representation of packed arrays
> > There is a proposal (with a one word change).
> > This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> > On Jun-08-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 8. 1352 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=1352> SV-CC VPI 27.37
> > "Multiclock sequence expression" error
> > There is a proposal (deletes one diagram and updates another)
> > This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> > On Jun-08-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 9. 3599 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3599> SV-CC svBitVecVal
> > as reference type is missing asterisk
> > There is a proposal (changes the font for one word and adds an *).
> > I found it very difficult to locate this update. It seems to me
> > that the Editor may miss it.
> > This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> > On Jun-22-2011, the SV-CC PASSED this proposal (unanimous)
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 10. 3385 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3385> SV-AC Possible
> > ambiguity when deferred assertion action block calls nested function
> > There is a proposal (2 pages) that adds new text.
> > This is the second time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> > Passed by voice vote 2011-07-12: 10y/0n/0a.
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 11. 2412 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2412> SV-AC Allow clock
> > inference in sequences
> > There is a proposal (5 pages)
> > This is the 4th time this proposal has gone to the Champions.
> > The amended proposal was approved by e-mail ballot on 6/28/2011:
> > 8y/0n/0a
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 12. 3069 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=3069> SV-AC Relax rules
> > for $global_clock resolution
> > There is a proposal (6 pages)
> > This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> > The proposal was approved by the SV-AC on 6/21/2011 6y, 0n, 0a
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 13. 2794 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2794> SV-EC Clarify
> > queue methods return status
> > There is a proposal (2 pages)
> > The champion's feedback of September 29th was addressed.
> > Proposal 2794-3a was unanimously approved by the sv-ec in the
> > conference call held on July 18, 2011.
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 14. 2112 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2112> SV-EC Remove
> > restrictions on NBA assignments to class members
> > There is a proposal (2 pages)
> > This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> > Version 4 of the proposal (2112 NBA v4) was unanimously approved
> > by the sv-ec in the conference call held on July 18, 2011.
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
> >
> > 15. 2900 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2900> SV-EC Associative
> > array should consider the context of an lvalue to create an entry
> > There is a proposal (1 page)
> > This is the first time this proposal has gone to the Champion's.
> > Version 4 of the proposal (2900 assoc lvalue v4) was unanimously
> > approved by the sv-ec in the conference call held on July 18, 2011.
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
> >
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.