RE: [sv-champions] Email vote ending June 11, 2011

Hi, Francoise.

The change in 2905 was to make it consistent with the BNF everywhere else. Nowhere else in the BNF do timeunit declarations have attribute instances.

(It is also not clear to me what would be the issue of attribute instances on timeunit declarations. They are also not allowed on `timescale compiler directives.)

Regards,
Shalom

> > 2. 2905 <http://www.eda-twiki.org/svdb/view.php?id=2905> Errata SV-EC BNF
> > bug for attribute instance along with timeunits_declaration
> > There is a proposal (one change to the timeunits BNF)
> > Approved in email vote 5/11/2011, proposal:
> > 2905_attribute_timeunits.pdf
> >
> > Approve __ Oppose __
>
> I am not opposing to the change but I am not quite sure why we would not
> allow attribute_instances on timeunits declarations. attribute_instances are
> allowed on module items, port declarations and non port module items. Is it
> because you can have the same time unit declaration more than once in the
> same scope and there would be an issue if the attribute instance was
> specified on one time unit but not the other time unit declaration?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.