Re: [sv-champions] 12-day email vote

From: Brad Pierce <Brad.Pierce_at_.....>
Date: Wed Sep 12 2007 - 12:19:08 PDT
Neil,

Yes to all except 1681, because I don't know which proposal I'm supposed
to be reviewing -- so on 1681 I vote 'No'.

Comments (not friendly amendments) --

   1928 -- "expression context" is not defined in the LRM

   1927 -- should be "none ... remain" pending, not "none ... remains
pending", see, for example, 

       http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-non2.htm

   1737 -- In the body of text, 'assume property', 'assert property' and
'cover property' should not look exactly the same as the rest of the
text.  Also, why is "inferred" in a parenthetical comment?

   1459 -- Why is this not 'Resolved', but instead 'Feedback'?

   1383 -- It's confusing to still have the proposal there even though
it wasn't approved.  Also, what were the votes for this issue?

-- Brad



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-champions@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-champions@eda.org] On
Behalf Of Neil Korpusik
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 7:01 PM
To: sv-champions@eda.org
Subject: [sv-champions] 12-day email vote

SystemVerilog Champions,

I am calling for an email vote on the following Mantis items.
I believe that this is the first time each of these has been considered
by the Champions (except for 1681). Based on the Mantis status, it
appears that all of these has been udpated to be consistent with draft
3a. Some of them are flagged as duplicates of others.

The email vote will run for 12 days, ending on September 17th at 7pm
PST.

Please mark each mantis item with your vote.
If you vote no, you must provide a reason.
I would like you to also provide a reason if you decide to abstain.

Neil




1.  0001957  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  Macros: ambiguous whether empty arguments can be
used
             Unanimously approved by SV-BC on August 6, 2007.
2.  0001951  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  "Null argument" to mean "omitted argument" may be
confusing
             On August 20, 2007 the SV-BC unanimously approved 3.
0001945  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  Syntax error in 19.6.1 example
             Unanimously approved by SV-BC on August 6, 2007 4.  0001935
Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  ansi_port_declaration BNF (A.1.3)
             Unanimously approved by SV-BC on August 6, 2007.
5.  0001928  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-EC  clarification of coverpoint value resolution
(18.5.6)
             Approved on July/23/2007 unanimously vote.
6.  0001927  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-EC  clarification of default sequence transition bin in
covergroup
             Approved on July/23/2007 unanimously vote.
7.  0001899  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  Follow-up to 1831, redundant text
             approved by SV-BC e-mail vote that concluded on July 9,
2007.
8.  0001871  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-EC  clarification needed for illegal/ignore transition
bins
             Approved on July/23/2007 unanimously vote.
9.  0001864  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  D3a 6.7: logic and reg are not just equivalent types
             Approved unanimously by SV-BC on August 6, 2007 10. 0001860
Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  D3 22.2.2.2 ref port declaration syntax
             Unanimously to be a duplicate of 1935 by SV-BC on August 6,
2007 11. 0001855  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-AC  issues with 22.10 after 1722
             duplicate
12. 0001814  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  D3 33.5.2.2: sentence in wrong place
             unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote concluded on July
9, 2007.
13. 0001804  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-AC  Add abiltiy to require equiv types for typed formal
args
             Voice vote on 2007-08-07 not to address this since lint
tools can
             check such conditions
14. 0001794  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  uninstantiated interface/program
             Approved unanimously by SV-BC on August 6, 2007 15. 0001745
Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  "outside of" and "inside of" are bad style
             Approved unanimously by SV-BC on August 6, 2007.
16. 0001743  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  Refinements to 0000331
             already covered by expanded version of 0000331 by SV-BC on
August 6, 2007 17. 0001737  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-AC  Incomplete fix from 1381
             Resolved by e-mail ballot on 2007-05-28, 7y/0n/4a 18.
0001731  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-AC  Sampled value functions with arbitrary clocks
             Passed by e-mail ballot 2007-07-03, 9y/0n/2a 19. 0001689
Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  Return type of $bits()
             duplicate of SVDB 919.
20. 0001681  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-AC  Introduce global clocking
             New proposal was uploaded - redoing email vote (didn't
reach quorum) 21. 0001626  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  12.3: should say clearly that 1364 10.4.4c) does not
apply
             no action as it was already addressed by the editor 22.
0001625  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  20.1: typo - "block" -> "blocks"
             On July 9, 2007 the attached proposal, typos_1625.htm, was
unanimously
             approved by the SV-BC.
23. 0001607  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  import of a forward typedef
             SV-BC unanimously approved resolution of this issue 24.
0001548  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             V-1364 5.1.13: description of condition reversed
             SV-BC unanimously approved
25. 0001484  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  Package declarations should not refer to $unit
             SV-BC unanimously approved
26. 0001462  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  19.5, A.1.2: timeunits_declaration formatting
confusing
             SV-BC unanimously approved
27. 0001459  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-EC  Mailbox 'new' method should never return null
             passed unanimously
28. 0001444  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  size warnings in assignment patterns should be
allowed
             SV-BC unanimously approved
29. 0001383  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-AC  Property coverage definition
             Duplicate of 805
30. 0001351  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  12.4.3: endtask should not have ;
             was unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote 31. 0001341
Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             V-1364 effect of `resetall on `begin_keywords not defined
in 1364, 19.11
             unanimously approved
32. 0001340  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  inconsistency between module ports and task
arguments
             SV-BC unanimously voted to accept 33. 0001331  Yes ___ No
___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  10.4.1.3 xref to 8.17 should be 8.18
             SV-BC unanimously approved
34. 0001280  Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  Wrong replication example at end of 3.8
             unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote 35. 0001233  Yes
___ No ___ Abstain ___
             SV-BC  8.13.1: "similar assignments above" unclear
             unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Neil Korpusik                                     Tel: 408-276-6385
Frontend Technologies (FTAP)                      Fax: 408-276-5092
Sun Microsystems                       email: neil.korpusik@sun.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Sep 12 12:40:55 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 12 2007 - 12:40:57 PDT