> > > > 1. 0001957 Yes __X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC Macros: ambiguous whether empty arguments can be used > Unanimously approved by SV-BC on August 6, 2007. > 2. 0001951 Yes __X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC "Null argument" to mean "omitted argument" may be > confusing > On August 20, 2007 the SV-BC unanimously approved > 3. 0001945 Yes __X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC Syntax error in 19.6.1 example > Unanimously approved by SV-BC on August 6, 2007 > 4. 0001935 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC ansi_port_declaration BNF (A.1.3) > Unanimously approved by SV-BC on August 6, 2007. > 5. 0001928 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-EC clarification of coverpoint value resolution (18.5.6) > Approved on July/23/2007 unanimously vote. > 6. 0001927 Yes __X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-EC clarification of default sequence transition bin in > covergroup > Approved on July/23/2007 unanimously vote. > 7. 0001899 Yes __X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC Follow-up to 1831, redundant text > approved by SV-BC e-mail vote that concluded on July 9, 2007. > 8. 0001871 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-EC clarification needed for illegal/ignore transition > bins > Approved on July/23/2007 unanimously vote. > 9. 0001864 Yes __X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC D3a 6.7: logic and reg are not just equivalent types > Approved unanimously by SV-BC on August 6, 2007 > 10. 0001860 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC D3 22.2.2.2 ref port declaration syntax > Unanimously to be a duplicate of 1935 by SV-BC on August 6, > 2007 > 11. 0001855 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-AC issues with 22.10 after 1722 > duplicate > 12. 0001814 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC D3 33.5.2.2: sentence in wrong place > unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote concluded on July > 9, 2007. > 13. 0001804 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-AC Add abiltiy to require equiv types for typed formal > args > Voice vote on 2007-08-07 not to address this since lint tools > can > check such conditions > 14. 0001794 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC uninstantiated interface/program > Approved unanimously by SV-BC on August 6, 2007 Note to editor: I thing the added sentence should appended to the paragraph, not a new paragraph. > 15. 0001745 Yes ___ No _X__ Abstain ___ > SV-BC "outside of" and "inside of" are bad style > Approved unanimously by SV-BC on August 6, 2007. This type of change should not be going through the committees; it should be at the editor's discretion. In this particular case, the exiting wording is clear and the amount of my time required to review this proposal is not justified. I'm not trying to demean the work Shalom has put into this, but he and I have different opinions of where our efforts should be spent. > 16. 0001743 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC Refinements to 0000331 > already covered by expanded version of 0000331 by SV-BC on > August 6, 2007 > 17. 0001737 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-AC Incomplete fix from 1381 > Resolved by e-mail ballot on 2007-05-28, 7y/0n/4a > 18. 0001731 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-AC Sampled value functions with arbitrary clocks > Passed by e-mail ballot 2007-07-03, 9y/0n/2a > 19. 0001689 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC Return type of $bits() > duplicate of SVDB 919. > 20. 0001681 Yes ___ No X___ Abstain ___ > SV-AC Introduce global clocking > New proposal was uploaded - redoing email vote (didn't reach > quorum) This item is still up for an e-mail vote in the SV-AC > 21. 0001626 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC 12.3: should say clearly that 1364 10.4.4c) does not > apply > no action as it was already addressed by the editor > 22. 0001625 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC 20.1: typo - "block" -> "blocks" > On July 9, 2007 the attached proposal, typos_1625.htm, was > unanimously > approved by the SV-BC. > 23. 0001607 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC import of a forward typedef > SV-BC unanimously approved resolution of this issue > 24. 0001548 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > V-1364 5.1.13: description of condition reversed > SV-BC unanimously approved > 25. 0001484 Yes __X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC Package declarations should not refer to $unit > SV-BC unanimously approved > 26. 0001462 Yes __X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC 19.5, A.1.2: timeunits_declaration formatting > confusing > SV-BC unanimously approved > 27. 0001459 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-EC Mailbox 'new' method should never return null > passed unanimously > 28. 0001444 Yes __X_ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC size warnings in assignment patterns should be allowed > SV-BC unanimously approved > 29. 0001383 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-AC Property coverage definition > Duplicate of 805 > 30. 0001351 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC 12.4.3: endtask should not have ; > was unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote > 31. 0001341 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > V-1364 effect of `resetall on `begin_keywords not defined in > 1364, 19.11 > unanimously approved > 32. 0001340 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC inconsistency between module ports and task arguments > SV-BC unanimously voted to accept > 33. 0001331 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC 10.4.1.3 xref to 8.17 should be 8.18 > SV-BC unanimously approved > 34. 0001280 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC Wrong replication example at end of 3.8 > unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote > 35. 0001233 Yes _X__ No ___ Abstain ___ > SV-BC 8.13.1: "similar assignments above" unclear > unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Neil Korpusik Tel: 408-276-6385 > Frontend Technologies (FTAP) Fax: 408-276-5092 > Sun Microsystems email: neil.korpusik@sun.com > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Sep 12 11:48:33 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 12 2007 - 11:48:35 PDT