SystemVerilog Champions, I am calling for an email vote on the following Mantis items. I believe that this is the first time each of these has been considered by the Champions (except for 1681). Based on the Mantis status, it appears that all of these has been udpated to be consistent with draft 3a. Some of them are flagged as duplicates of others. The email vote will run for 12 days, ending on September 17th at 7pm PST. Please mark each mantis item with your vote. If you vote no, you must provide a reason. I would like you to also provide a reason if you decide to abstain. Neil 1. 0001957 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Macros: ambiguous whether empty arguments can be used Unanimously approved by SV-BC on August 6, 2007. 2. 0001951 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC "Null argument" to mean "omitted argument" may be confusing On August 20, 2007 the SV-BC unanimously approved 3. 0001945 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Syntax error in 19.6.1 example Unanimously approved by SV-BC on August 6, 2007 4. 0001935 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC ansi_port_declaration BNF (A.1.3) Unanimously approved by SV-BC on August 6, 2007. 5. 0001928 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-EC clarification of coverpoint value resolution (18.5.6) Approved on July/23/2007 unanimously vote. 6. 0001927 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-EC clarification of default sequence transition bin in covergroup Approved on July/23/2007 unanimously vote. 7. 0001899 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Follow-up to 1831, redundant text approved by SV-BC e-mail vote that concluded on July 9, 2007. 8. 0001871 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-EC clarification needed for illegal/ignore transition bins Approved on July/23/2007 unanimously vote. 9. 0001864 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC D3a 6.7: logic and reg are not just equivalent types Approved unanimously by SV-BC on August 6, 2007 10. 0001860 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC D3 22.2.2.2 ref port declaration syntax Unanimously to be a duplicate of 1935 by SV-BC on August 6, 2007 11. 0001855 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC issues with 22.10 after 1722 duplicate 12. 0001814 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC D3 33.5.2.2: sentence in wrong place unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote concluded on July 9, 2007. 13. 0001804 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Add abiltiy to require equiv types for typed formal args Voice vote on 2007-08-07 not to address this since lint tools can check such conditions 14. 0001794 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC uninstantiated interface/program Approved unanimously by SV-BC on August 6, 2007 15. 0001745 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC "outside of" and "inside of" are bad style Approved unanimously by SV-BC on August 6, 2007. 16. 0001743 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Refinements to 0000331 already covered by expanded version of 0000331 by SV-BC on August 6, 2007 17. 0001737 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Incomplete fix from 1381 Resolved by e-mail ballot on 2007-05-28, 7y/0n/4a 18. 0001731 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Sampled value functions with arbitrary clocks Passed by e-mail ballot 2007-07-03, 9y/0n/2a 19. 0001689 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Return type of $bits() duplicate of SVDB 919. 20. 0001681 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Introduce global clocking New proposal was uploaded - redoing email vote (didn't reach quorum) 21. 0001626 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC 12.3: should say clearly that 1364 10.4.4c) does not apply no action as it was already addressed by the editor 22. 0001625 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC 20.1: typo - "block" -> "blocks" On July 9, 2007 the attached proposal, typos_1625.htm, was unanimously approved by the SV-BC. 23. 0001607 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC import of a forward typedef SV-BC unanimously approved resolution of this issue 24. 0001548 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ V-1364 5.1.13: description of condition reversed SV-BC unanimously approved 25. 0001484 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Package declarations should not refer to $unit SV-BC unanimously approved 26. 0001462 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC 19.5, A.1.2: timeunits_declaration formatting confusing SV-BC unanimously approved 27. 0001459 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-EC Mailbox 'new' method should never return null passed unanimously 28. 0001444 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC size warnings in assignment patterns should be allowed SV-BC unanimously approved 29. 0001383 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-AC Property coverage definition Duplicate of 805 30. 0001351 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC 12.4.3: endtask should not have ; was unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote 31. 0001341 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ V-1364 effect of `resetall on `begin_keywords not defined in 1364, 19.11 unanimously approved 32. 0001340 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC inconsistency between module ports and task arguments SV-BC unanimously voted to accept 33. 0001331 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC 10.4.1.3 xref to 8.17 should be 8.18 SV-BC unanimously approved 34. 0001280 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC Wrong replication example at end of 3.8 unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote 35. 0001233 Yes ___ No ___ Abstain ___ SV-BC 8.13.1: "similar assignments above" unclear unanimously approved by SV-BC e-mail vote -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Neil Korpusik Tel: 408-276-6385 Frontend Technologies (FTAP) Fax: 408-276-5092 Sun Microsystems email: neil.korpusik@sun.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Sep 7 16:19:32 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 07 2007 - 16:19:35 PDT