RE: [sv-champions] 5-day email vote 1723

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Wed Aug 29 2007 - 00:13:30 PDT
I question whether Stu should do 14, as the problem is not just the
language. The meaning is not at all clear. A so-called editorial fix may
inadvertently change the meaning. 

(As a champion, I currently have trouble reviewing that proposal as *I*
do not know what the intended meaning is. I also have trouble with the
following sentence in the proposal.)

Shalom  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 10:44 PM
> To: sv-champions@server.eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-champions] 5-day email vote 1723
> 
> I trust Stu to deal with editorial issues that go way beyond 
> missing semicolons.  He's a professional instructor, 
> successful author and the officially contracted P1800 editor.
> 
> For example, for each of the bullets requests 9 to 16 in
> 
>    http://www.eda-stds.org/sv/sv-champions/hm/0213.html
> 
> he already has the P1800 authority to honor such requests, if 
> he deems them appropriate.
> 
> That's part of the job he was contracted to do, and we should 
> get out of the way and let him do it.
>  
> -- Brad 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 12:14 PM
> To: Rich, Dave; Brad Pierce; sv-champions@eda.org
> Subject: RE: [sv-champions] 5-day email vote 1723
> 
> In the past, such Mantis items occurred mainly because there 
> was no editor yet, and it was necessary to have place holders 
> until such time as an editor would be assigned. 
> 
> > We have whole mantis items to add
> > or remove semi-colons, so there's nothing new there. 
> 
> I do agree that adding an additional line to an example can 
> be beyond an editorial change, but I think that in some 
> cases, where there is no technical controversy, the champions 
> should be allowed to do minor changes, for the very reason of 
> not getting bogged down in the entire approval process for 
> minor changes.
> 
> Shalom
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Wed Aug 29 00:14:52 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 29 2007 - 00:14:54 PDT