I question whether Stu should do 14, as the problem is not just the language. The meaning is not at all clear. A so-called editorial fix may inadvertently change the meaning. (As a champion, I currently have trouble reviewing that proposal as *I* do not know what the intended meaning is. I also have trouble with the following sentence in the proposal.) Shalom > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org > [mailto:owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Brad Pierce > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 10:44 PM > To: sv-champions@server.eda.org > Subject: RE: [sv-champions] 5-day email vote 1723 > > I trust Stu to deal with editorial issues that go way beyond > missing semicolons. He's a professional instructor, > successful author and the officially contracted P1800 editor. > > For example, for each of the bullets requests 9 to 16 in > > http://www.eda-stds.org/sv/sv-champions/hm/0213.html > > he already has the P1800 authority to honor such requests, if > he deems them appropriate. > > That's part of the job he was contracted to do, and we should > get out of the way and let him do it. > > -- Brad > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 12:14 PM > To: Rich, Dave; Brad Pierce; sv-champions@eda.org > Subject: RE: [sv-champions] 5-day email vote 1723 > > In the past, such Mantis items occurred mainly because there > was no editor yet, and it was necessary to have place holders > until such time as an editor would be assigned. > > > We have whole mantis items to add > > or remove semi-colons, so there's nothing new there. > > I do agree that adding an additional line to an example can > be beyond an editorial change, but I think that in some > cases, where there is no technical controversy, the champions > should be allowed to do minor changes, for the very reason of > not getting bogged down in the entire approval process for > minor changes. > > Shalom > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous > content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed Aug 29 00:14:52 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Aug 29 2007 - 00:14:54 PDT