I would also add that in many cases, an imperfect change/proposal is better than none, which leaves the LRM in the existing state. > At the champion's level, if there is nothing wrong with a > proposal, we should pass it through. If it can be made > better, we can pass that feedback back to the technical > committee. I'm just trying to make forward progress and avoid > cyclical loops of refinement. Shalom -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Aug 28 12:16:06 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 28 2007 - 12:16:06 PDT