RE: [sv-champions] 5-day email vote - 1615

I still feel that this language of 1615 is confusing:

"Calling a function that executes a fork..join_none block shall be
illegal in any context in which ... or any context other than in ..." 

Is there any reason to write, "in any context in which" instead of
simply "wherever"?

Can't "illegal in ... any context other than in" be written simply as
"legal only in"?

Probably "or" should be "and".

I don't think this is minor wordsmithing. I think the proposed language
is confusing.

>    13)  The editor, when implementing 1615, change 
> "join_noen" to "join_none".

Also, in "Examples of such illegal contexts are ... static variable
declaration initialized", should the last word be "initializers"?

Thanks,
Shalom

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.