Re: 11 October 2004 Unapproved Meeting Minutes

Thank you.

But something is still not clear.

> The timeline that we are working off of is the basis to determine slack
> and schedule issues like the cutoff date. If we were to go past the
> date we would need to revisit the timeline.

Thank you, I understand that.
But I repeat my original question:

> "The question was raised as to when the cutoff for work would need to
> be. Would it need to be December 2004 or could it be March 2005? After
> discussion, it was noted that a March 2005 cutoff would permit us to
> meet the DAC completion timeline."
>
> Was a decision made?

The minutes say there was a discussion and it was "noted that ...".
The minutes do NOT say that the group DECIDED to set a cutoff of March
instead of December for the ETF/BTF work.

The question is, when ETF and BTF plan their work, can they assume they
have until March to finish or not?

Also, does "March" mean March 1 or March 31?

Sorry if it sounds picky, but it is still ambiguous, and of non-trivial
importance.

Thanks,
Shalom

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Verification Methodology                    Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary