Re: 11 October 2004 Unapproved Meeting Minutes

According to Karen Pieper, the deadline for 1364 was maintained as December 2004.
If so, the minutes are misleading. The last sentence on that subject in the
minutes is

> After discussion, it was noted that a March 2005 cutoff would permit us to
> meet the DAC completion timeline.

Shalom

On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com wrote:

> Thank you.
>
> But something is still not clear.
>
> > The timeline that we are working off of is the basis to determine slack
> > and schedule issues like the cutoff date. If we were to go past the
> > date we would need to revisit the timeline.
>
> Thank you, I understand that.
> But I repeat my original question:
>
> > "The question was raised as to when the cutoff for work would need to
> > be. Would it need to be December 2004 or could it be March 2005? After
> > discussion, it was noted that a March 2005 cutoff would permit us to
> > meet the DAC completion timeline."
> >
> > Was a decision made?
>
> The minutes say there was a discussion and it was "noted that ...".
> The minutes do NOT say that the group DECIDED to set a cutoff of March
> instead of December for the ETF/BTF work.
>
> The question is, when ETF and BTF plan their work, can they assume they
> have until March to finish or not?
>
> Also, does "March" mean March 1 or March 31?
>
> Sorry if it sounds picky, but it is still ambiguous, and of non-trivial
> importance.
>
> Thanks,
> Shalom
>
>

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Verification Methodology                    Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary